- UID
- 4147
- 热情
- 16903
- 人气
- 22549
- 主题
- 11
- 帖子
- 5773
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 22702
- 分享
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 相册
- 1
- 好友
- 3
- 日志
- 2
- 在线时间
- 8413 小时
- 注册时间
- 2003-8-26
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 最后登录
- 2024-11-26
升级 13.51% - UID
- 4147
- 热情
- 16903
- 人气
- 22549
- 主题
- 11
- 帖子
- 5773
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 22702
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 注册时间
- 2003-8-26
|
十荡十决 发表于 2023-10-3 16:26
原来是这个意思啊。楼主扇思啊。这是非法逃税的行为。抓到可能被罚款,甚至是要坐牢的啊。 ...
差不多就是这个意思,连用基金买再租给自己都可能被视为逃税。 小聪明吃大亏,被IRD盯上,想想就麻烦。
Legally it is possible for you to hold a property in a company or a trust and then rent the property back for you to occupy as your home. However, from a tax perspective, an arrangement where an individual rents a property back from a company they are a shareholder of, or from a trust they are a beneficiary of, is at risk of being regarded as tax avoidance. The IRD have been fairly clear over the years that they regard any tax benefit from such an arrangement as potentially being a tax avoidance scheme.
Interestingly, with ring-fencing of tax losses on residential property about to come in, not only would you face the prospect of tax avoidance, but there would also potentially be no tax benefit for you in doing so, as any tax losses would be ring-fenced.
What about if there were no tax losses and instead a tax profit? You would then have tax to pay, which the IRD are unlikely to have an issue with, but you should have an issue with that as you would then be paying tax for the privilege of living in your own home. Unless there is some other motivation behind your proposal, it seems inadvisable for you to hold a property that is your home via a trust or a company and rent it back. |
|