- UID
- 157436
- 热情
- 2342
- 人气
- 2798
- 主题
- 88
- 帖子
- 2277
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 3768
- 分享
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 相册
- 0
- 好友
- 15
- 日志
- 1
- 在线时间
- 1595 小时
- 注册时间
- 2008-9-25
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 最后登录
- 2022-4-20
升级    17.87% - UID
- 157436
- 热情
- 2342
- 人气
- 2798
- 主题
- 88
- 帖子
- 2277
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 3768
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 注册时间
- 2008-9-25
|
安城老板Jin Yan Zhang和她老公Ming Fay Young法院判决书， 因为欺骗移民局，提供假材料，坑害新移民，判决书网上可查。
天网恢恢，疏而不漏。
http://www.justice.govt.nz/asset ... 35-Feng-v-Zhang.pdf
http://www.justice.govt.nz/asset ... 34-Feng-v-Young.pdf
2] The grounds were in essence:
[2.1] Ms Zhang engaged in dishonest and misleading behaviour, which is a ground for complaint pursuant to section 44(2) of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act).
[2.2] In particular:
[2.2.1] Ms Zhang, with her business associate (who is also her husband) Mr Young, were licensed immigration advisers. They operated their practice through a company named Ancheng International Group Limited.
[2.2.2] The complainant, who was in China, engaged her to obtain a job offer, and a work visa for New Zealand.
[2.2.3] Ms Zhang led the complainant to believe he had employment in New Zealand as a chef and that his annual income would be $31,200. He paid approximately $24,000 for Ms Zhang’s services; relying on the offer of employment and Ms Zhang’s assurances of his immigration prospects.
[2.2.4] Ms Zhang obtained a work visa for the complainant.
[2.2.5] When he arrived in New Zealand, Ms Zhang took the complainant to work in a restaurant, which was not the one on his work visa. He received approximately $5 per hour for his work. The complainant objected, and Ms Zhang took him to a series of work places where the employers paid him less than the minimum wage.
[2.2.6] On 27 November 2009, Ms Zhang submitted an application to vary the complainant’s work visa conditions, and in a cover letter said that he was still working for the employer named on the visa. In fact, he never worked there.
[2.3] Accordingly, the complaint involved Ms Zhang misleading the complainant, providing false information to Immigration New Zealand, and charging fees that were more than fair or reasonable. Inevitably, the conduct also amounts to a systematic breach of several aspects of the Licensed Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2010. |
|
发表于 2016-8-1 17:43:07
分享
收藏
