- UID
- 86790
- 热情
- 5349
- 人气
- 8605
- 主题
- 112
- 帖子
- 22362
- 精华
- 3
- 积分
- 18348
- 分享
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 相册
- 2
- 好友
- 6
- 日志
- 0
- 在线时间
- 12784 小时
- 注册时间
- 2006-9-5
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 最后登录
- 2025-1-1
   
升级   66.96% - UID
- 86790
- 热情
- 5349
- 人气
- 8605
- 主题
- 112
- 帖子
- 22362
- 精华
- 3
- 积分
- 18348
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 注册时间
- 2006-9-5
|
本帖最后由 charlie2e 于 2010-10-22 11:29 编辑
p133 mean there is no duty to investigate the truth of statement of fact, you can rely on the representor and if the statement of fact is false , then they have made a misrep.
on the other hand if you take investigation yourself and discover some problem but still enter contract, there's no misrep coz you rely on your own knowledge.
P131 case the forecast is based on genuine past profits. In that case they made a "negligent" forecast, the profit figure were way off. therefore, they are still liable for misrep because the figures are not based on good grounds.
not sure what you asking for the others. |
|