|
[size=13.3333px]询价时候，对方的维修报价如下：
[size=13.3333px]Providing a quote to repair a roof leak is very difficult as often the cause is not obvious and as such we need to remove a roof sheet ( or nails, screws roof tiles etc ) to locate the cause. [size=13.3333px]Often when we locate the cause it is being repaired as we put the roof back together. [size=13.3333px]If we are not repairing we have at least diagnosed the cause of the water entry and can provide a report and advise on what is required for a longterm repair. [size=13.3333px]We are required to wear harness gear for health and safety reasons. [size=13.3333px]The cost for callout is $120.00 + gst with extra charges depending on what is required to track the leak to an entry point, the charges being determined by how long this work takes, height and pitch of the roof as well as any materials used to repair / temporary repair. [size=13.3333px]On average the full cost to carry out the above diagnosis, temp repair or repair comes to between 280.00 + gst
to $500.00 + gst
[size=13.3333px]来了不到一小时，没使用安全带，因为房顶坡度小，用梯子直接上去， [size=13.3333px]把瓦片扒开，没看到明显漏水问题，判断是因为几片叶子阻塞了水道，导致水流改向引起的漏水，又把瓦片装回去，吹了几片叶子下来， [size=13.3333px]收费280+gst，合理吗？合理就付掉，不合理建议如何处理？谢谢大家指点
补充内容 (2024-6-7 13:29):
这是第二家得call out解释：
The $195.00 charge covers us arriving, assesing the leak and replacing up to 4 tiles. If the leak can be fixed on the spot, we will do so under this charge.
补充内容 (2024-6-9 09:51):
鉴于对方在初始报价的时候，额外收费部分没有明确项目和收费。callout费也没有解释包含内容和不包含内容。决定使用小额法庭，谢谢各位网友的指教
补充内容 (2024-6-9 09:55):
后续结果会更新上来，大家在回复中可以看到trade们为了维护自己的利益，他们的话术在那些点上，无非就是集中攻击用了服务不付钱，嫌贵等等指责。
补充内容 (2024-6-9 09:57):
这次的争议，其实主要不是贵和便宜的问题，而是前期报价模糊，不提主要的额外收费项目和具体数额，存在误导的问题，这个肯定要干他
补充内容 (2024-6-9 09:59):
来新西兰很久了，遇到过租房中介刺客，遇到过钣金刺客，遇到过roofer刺客，也遇到过收费合理，明晰报价的水工，电工，builder，钣金，机械，roofer
补充内容 (2024-6-9 10:00):
留学生时期，对房屋中介忍气吞声了一次。此后遇到的各种刺客，维权从来没有输过，这次也不会例外。除了维权，更会将案例和这个商户广泛宣传 | 
发表于 2024-6-7 10:38:24
分享
收藏
