- UID
- 124576
- 热情
- 9
- 人气
- 11
- 主题
- 0
- 帖子
- 1011
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 528
- 分享
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 相册
- 0
- 好友
- 0
- 日志
- 0
- 在线时间
- 1080 小时
- 注册时间
- 2007-8-1
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 最后登录
- 2018-5-16
升级 5.6% - UID
- 124576
- 热情
- 9
- 人气
- 11
- 主题
- 0
- 帖子
- 1011
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 528
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 注册时间
- 2007-8-1
|
Just a further comment.
Many of the great composer in historybased a lot of their works on folk songs in the even olderdays. In fact, according to one of my music teachers manyyears ago, Tchaikovsky was renowned for his clevercopying. On the other hand, genuine compositions were notnecessarily the best. Franz Lizst was no doubt the mostoriginal composer of his time. In fact he revolutionised musiccompositions and had a big influence on modernmusic. However he was never called the greatest (he was thegreatest pianist though). For example, his piano concertiwere highly original. And, most importantly, unlikely many othercomposers who'd just put their work aside after the first composition,he actually went back and painstakingly reviewed his ownwork. But at the end of the day, in concert halls, hisconcerti were never performed nearly as much as the one(s) by Schumann,Chopin and Rachmaninov, which are much less original... But do you callthose ones original compositions? I bet you do.
The point I wantto make is that originality can be rather hard to define. Further, while it is much harder to be completely original, it is notalways the best route at the same time.
Revolution is not likely to be successful without a lot of blood...
[ 本帖最后由 dk7 于 2007-9-14 17:37 编辑 ] |
|