关于医疗（牙医）失败后索赔（已经回答）

小豆芽

我妈牙齿在某牙医做了根管治疗，因为牙医手术没有做好，我妈现在这颗牙齿要拔掉，做搭桥或是植牙，这个牙医说他没有植牙服务，可以免费为我妈做搭桥，可是我信不过这个牙医，而且搭桥对另外2个牙齿带来后患，毕竟我妈年纪不小了。

现在植牙费用是6000-8000，这个牙医现在最多赔偿3600（他搭桥自己收费是2700+退回原来治疗费用900）。 我妈看2个专家，都有报告第一说明这个牙齿的确是因为手术不成功需要重做，第2给出了需要重做的相关费用。

我想问问，这个牙医给的赔偿是否合理，赔偿3600离6000-8000还差很多钱，如果不合理那么这个牙医要赔偿多少才比较合理？其实植牙不找专家做也要6400还不包含GST，基本7000是跑不掉了。

谢谢各位给的专业意见了，我朋友也是贵公司的客户，因为贵公司服务很专业服务也好我朋友就介绍我来这里发帖询问，谢谢了。

肥猫999

要先找acc，ACC拒绝了再找律师和ACC理论，在NZ比较难直接告DENTIST这类的，虽然有NEGLIGENCE的民事诉讼，但ACC COVER了这一类，而且他们这些PROFESSIONALS也有保险

AMICUS_LAW

您好，首先ACC是否接受理赔要取于您的伤害是否被定义为treatment injury,以下是相关法律：

Treatment injury

• (1)
  Treatment injury means personal injury that is—
  • (a)
    suffered by a person—
    • (i)
      seeking treatment from 1 or more registered health professionals; or
    • (ii)
      receiving treatment from, or at the direction of, 1 or more registered health professionals; or
    • (iii)
      referred to in subsection (7); and
  • (b)
    caused by treatment; and
  • (c)
    not a necessary part, or ordinary consequence, of the treatment, taking into account all the circumstances of the treatment, including—
    • (i)
      the person's underlying health condition at the time of the treatment; and
    • (ii)
      the clinical knowledge at the time of the treatment.
  
  (2)
  Treatment injury does not include the following kinds of personal injury:
  
  • (a)
    personal injury that is wholly or substantially caused by a person's underlying health condition:
  • (b)
    personal injury that is solely attributable to a resource allocation decision:
  • (c)
    personal injury that is a result of a person unreasonably withholding or delaying their consent to undergo treatment.
  
  (3)
  The fact that the treatment did not achieve a desired result does not, of itself, constitute treatment injury.
  
  (4)
  Treatment injury includes personal injury suffered by a person as a result of treatment given as part of a clinical trial, in the circumstances described in subsection (5) or subsection (6).
  
  (5)
  One of the circumstances referred to in subsection (4) is where the claimant did not agree, in writing, to participate in the trial.
  
  (6)
  The other circumstance referred to in subsection (4) is where—
  
  • (a)
    an ethics committee—
    • (i)
      approved the trial; and
    • (ii)
      was satisfied that the trial was not to be conducted principally for the benefit of the manufacturer or distributor of the medicine or item being trialled; and
  
  
  • (b)
    the ethics committee was approved by the Health Research Council of New Zealand or the Director-General of Health at the time it gave its approval.

如果是的话ACC会受理理赔，而如果不是的您需要通过Disputes Tribunal进行诉讼来告相关
的医生。同时，您应该向New Zealand Dental council投诉相关证所。以下是相关连接：

http://www.dentalcouncil.org.nz/dcInfoConsumerConcerns

如果需要帮助，请和我们联系。