Extended Warranty - 你买不买？

NewLynnHse

翻页啦。。。

wishjess

cqy7lvxl 发表于 2012-9-14 13:10
Not agree. Have you tried to repair a washing machine or a fridge? A service man will charge call  ...

确实没修过冰箱洗衣机，因为木有坏过，相比之下电子产品坏的很勤。老实说如果那些上了年头的修起来又贵的就直接买新的了。。

naturearia

NewLynnHse 发表于 2012-9-14 16:02
你没有选“我爱小老鼠”啊？

刚看了一下才发现悲催的小老鼠，到现在还木有被爱一下下哦，姐木有办法啦，改不了啦！
下次看到给你颁个奖先。。。

~CHRISTY~

我的冰箱有買...洗衣機沒買~~

因為冰箱要買EXTENDED WARRANTY只要$50..感覺還可以

无过

买不买我是要看东西的...比如笔记本之类的我是不买的，但是洗衣机，冰箱之类的我还是买的...
我买的电视机就用上了，3年后电视机坏了，直接换了个新款的

季雪儿

为什么没有“我爱季雪儿”选项和“我爱米虫宝宝的宝宝”呀

NewLynnHse

季雪儿 发表于 2012-9-14 19:27
为什么没有“我爱季雪儿”选项和“我爱米虫宝宝的宝宝”呀

不行啦，大家只能爱小老鼠。。。

季雪儿

NewLynnHse 发表于 2012-9-14 19:43
不行啦，大家只能爱小老鼠。。。

爱之深责之切～～～大家都来痛骂你～～

NewLynnHse

季雪儿 发表于 2012-9-14 20:05
爱之深责之切～～～大家都来痛骂你～～

这个我相信。。。所谓“打是亲骂是爱”。。。哈哈

miyukio118899

买过，但是没什么用，以后再也不会买了。

miaomeow

不买，读书时候就知道是骗人的

leeliglobal

cqy7lvxl 发表于 2012-9-14 13:20
let's put an example on the attachment picutre.

second line Malfunction due to "normal wear & te ...

记得上课学过case study `reasonable` 是和同类产品比出来的.
比如说你去A家买了个新的冰箱 用了一年就坏了 没有misuse但是市场上冰箱的平均寿命是10年+这个就可以告。。。

关于misuse也是比出来的 很多都是跟Case

Honeycat2002

买过，从没用过

BabyG

一般都是大件的電器才考慮加。。

BTW我頂第4個選項哈哈哈

NewLynnHse

BabyG 发表于 2012-9-17 10:01
一般都是大件的電器才考慮加。。

BTW我頂第4個選項哈哈哈

{:8_483:}{:8_483:}

一天

cqy7lvxl 发表于 2012-9-14 12:42
Not agree with some of the comments above. CGA has no clean cut/defination of how long an appliance  ...

这个，太简单了，先修，再让他们付账单，太多太多的案例了。。。

Tribunal 上厅顶多顶多半天，实际上厅时间我也就二十分钟，和保险公司打交道，省了2-3k。你工资多少钱一小时，反正我的时间是没这么值钱。

一天

naturearia 发表于 2012-9-14 16:01
刚来时不懂，买过，后来知道他们销售员主要靠这个拿提成之后坚决不买啦。。。
据说卖这个比卖电器的利润高 ...

恩，我也是这么猜的，买东西让打折，死活不打，坑吭哧哧半天，说你要是买Ex Warranty的话，有打折。
一次两次还不知道，次数一多，自然知道这个东西就是没成本的东东（你买不买，他多半还得负责质量），自然有大折扣。

一天

cqy7lvxl 发表于 2012-9-14 13:20
let's put an example on the attachment picutre.

second line Malfunction due to "normal wear & te ...

Well，这个'reasonable'不是我或者商家能单方面决定的，是Tribunal的调解员/法官决定的,

SOME EXAMPLES
Just how long is it reasonable to expect a product to last? A check of the available Disputes Tribunal cases suggests the answer is frequently "longer than the warranty".

The Fridge
Product: A double door fridge and freezer purchased in January 2002 for just under $5,000.
Problem: Stopped working in November 2007. Buyer was charged $842.50 towards repair. Broke again in November 2008 and proved uneconomic to repair.
Warranty: Five years.
Decision: Two major failures within seven years was not good enough. It did not matter that the failures were outside the warranty or that a brochure explained that repair costs were to be shared between the buyer and seller.
Result: Buyer entitled to a new fridge or his money back. But no reimbursement for repair costs because the replacement fridge was better than the original.

The Laptop
Product: Laptop purchased in March 2007.
Problem: Developed a fault in February 2010 and was taken back to the store where it was repaired after about four and a half weeks.
Warranty: Buyer purchased a three-year extended warranty for $300.
Decision: The repair time bordered on unreasonable given that the problem was caused by a known fault with that model of laptop. Retailer had complied with the law but after buying an extended warranty the buyer could have expected better service.
Result: Extended warranty cancelled and the buyer's $300 refunded.

The Chairs
Product: Two recliner chairs purchased in September 2007 for just under $1200.
Problem: By March 2009 the cushioning on both chairs was crooked or indented, one chair had been repaired with replacement foam.
Warranty: Seller argued the warranty for the foam expired after 12 months, and that the buyer caused a problem by always leaning to one side of the chair.
Decision: Lopsided cushioning was unacceptable after eighteen months given the price. Leaning to one side of an armchair was not abnormal or unreasonable.
Result: Buyers entitled to a refund.

The Fridge 2
Product: Fridge freezer purchased in June 2002.
Problem: In August 2009 the fridge stopped working properly. The retailer was out of business.
Warranty: The manufacturer's call centre told the buyer they could not help as the fridge was outside the 12 month manufacturer's warranty. A repair company (charging $125) advised repairs would cost $900 so the buyer got rid of the fridge and bought a new one.
Decision: Seven years was not a reasonable time for a fridge to last before a major component failed.
Result: Buyer awarded $435 compensation for the three years remaining on the reasonable life of fridge plus $125 for the repair quote.

From stuff
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/ ... extended-warranties

naturearia

一天 发表于 2012-9-20 09:53
恩，我也是这么猜的，买东西让打折，死活不打，坑吭哧哧半天，说你要是买Ex Warranty的话，有打折。
一次 ...

你的宝宝好可爱啊

一天

:D
实际小宝宝都很可爱的。
不过我女儿真的是太古怪精灵了。。。

catface

不买 有问题找卖家和厂家申诉  说句实话大件花大价钱凭什么加钱买维修 一般至少都要五年 以前上班这种申诉例子很多 还有个冰箱用了快十年机械问题厂家给赔个新的。这是我们的权利 就该争取

dannywii

有員工價就買
二三十跟一兩百塊差距是聽大的

knocknock

买过一次什么用都没有，以后再不买了，听天由命。。。

QMNZ

LJCalvin 发表于 2012-9-14 11:12
没有我恨小老鼠选项！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！

+1+10+100{:8_475:}

:TicklyRain:

看情况，修起来贵、短期内不打算换的都会买。

iris

觉得电视的要买，冰箱不用
我也是电视用上了，修好了