- UID
- 280155
- 热情
- 102519
- 人气
- 126625
- 主题
- 1740
- 帖子
- 96446
- 精华
- 18
- 积分
- 164017
- 分享
- 0
- 记录
- 1
- 相册
- 1
- 好友
- 273
- 日志
- 0
- 在线时间
- 31617 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-3-22
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 最后登录
- 2020-1-2
升级 0.01% - UID
- 280155
- 热情
- 102519
- 人气
- 126625
- 主题
- 1740
- 帖子
- 96446
- 精华
- 18
- 积分
- 164017
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 注册时间
- 2011-3-22
|
vickiliu1974 发表于 2014-11-25 18:43
首先钱在从钱匣在传送的过程中卡在传送带或钱匣之间的情况的确会经常发生。
ATM说白了就是一个PC运行一套 ...
我也是看了这个报导才这么说的。感觉银行是得过且过,如果LZ放弃了,他们也就不管了。Herald说的这个人主要是数目比较大,所以没有放弃。像你说的,账目也是对的。只是不知道怎么卡到只有等到做maintenance的时候才发现。而且那些什么第三方人员来处理这一说根本不管LZ的事,LZ是银行的客户,这事就是银行和LZ之间的事。
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/bay-of ... p;objectid=11180564
In one case, a customer tried to deposit $1055 in an ATM, but the machine only recorded $330. She cancelled her transaction and only $330 was returned.
When the customer complained about being "short-changed", the bank said that according to the ATM's records everything balanced. She was advised to complain to the Banking Ombudsman.
"The complainant's claim the machine was hiding her money was only proved correct when the funds were found during routine maintenance," Battell says.
|
|