科学界也来凑叶mm的热闹 (更新，Nature编辑道歉)

萨米

http://www.nature.com/news/why-g ... -suspicions-1.11109

这是最新的Nature从叶诗文事件引起讨论的文章。

有兴趣的可以读读，估计看了会有很多人气得跳起来。不过没关系。看看comments，里面有很多有力的反驳

EDITORS’ NOTE (updated 6 August 2012)

This article has drawn an extraordinary level of outraged response. The volume of comments has been so great that our online commenting system is unable to cope: it deletes earlier posts as new ones arrive. We much regret this ongoing problem. The disappearance of some cogent responses to the story has fuelled suspicions that Nature is deliberately censoring the strongest criticisms. This is absolutely not the case: Nature welcomes critically minded discussion of our content. (We intentionally removed only a few comments that violated our Community Guidelines by being abusive or defamatory, including several that offensively stereotyped the many Chinese readers who commented on the story.)

Many of the commenters have questioned why we changed the original subtitle of the story from “‘Performance profiling’ could help catch sports cheats” to “‘Performance profiling’ could help dispel doubts”. The original version of the title was unfair to the swimmer Ye Shiwen and did not reflect the substance of the story. We regret that the original appeared in the first place. We also regret that the original story included an error about the improvement in Ye’s time for the 400-metre individual medley: she improved by 7 seconds since July 2011, not July 2012. We have corrected the error.

We apologize to our readers for these errors, and for the unintended removal of comments because of technical issues with our commenting system. Below we reproduce one of the most thorough and thoughtful of the hundreds of responses we received. Beneath it, we continue with our response.

萨米

更新，Nature编辑道歉

CZ007

好好一届各国人民大团结的盛会，让他搞成这样

susie77

看检验结果以事实说话

六月飞雪

好一个个science届权威杂志，SHAME ON YOU!
什么狗屁！

38.1℃

先沙发再读。。。。。。。。。。