新西兰天维网社区

标题: 无聊转发个两秒车的视频。 [打印本页]

作者: jadecolin 时间: 2011-10-10 12:55:46 标题: 无聊转发个两秒车的视频。

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jOQFMlpdVI&feature=relmfu

作者: elvisc07 时间: 2011-10-10 13:10:40

BUGATTI

作者: 優5566質 时间: 2011-10-10 13:17:59

Bugatti這種2.52s加速到底啥概念....心臟真的受的了嗎...

作者: 大蛋 时间: 2011-10-10 13:20:20

刚在6PARK上看了

作者: 原厂控 时间: 2011-10-10 13:25:55

本帖最后由原厂控于 2011-10-10 13:44 编辑

The acceleration of the cat shot (0 to 140 kts - 260km/h in 3 seconds) causes your inner ear to make you "feel" like you have pitched down when the acceleration of the cat shot ends. You "feel" like you are pointed nose down at the water (not "inverted" as you mention in your question). You must ignore this "feel" and fly instruments only. Your "feel" would have you yank the stick back, at very slow airspeed and very low altitude, cuasing you to stall and hammer-head into the water (it's happened several times in the past).

A night cat shot is a pure instrument scan where you ingnore your "feel" and rely totally on instruments. For a night cat shot, you put your survival flashlight on your back-up gyro (in case of a gen failure), you set a safe single engine climb attitude (just in case), and you PRAY nothing goes wrong with the jet.

I would argue that a night cat shot is a true 0/0 takeoff (black sky, black water, no horizon, no terrain, no references other than instruments).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDGvQHru8-o&feature=results_video&playnext=1&list=PL051504A99B673251

作者: cmm0918 时间: 2011-10-10 13:44:50

这有啥好比的.不是一个档次的车.

作者: cmm0918 时间: 2011-10-10 13:45:31

要比,就得拿价钱差不多的比.

作者: cmm0918 时间: 2011-10-10 13:47:35

911 turbo s和gtr比。肯定选gtr，性价比高很多。

作者: triseven 时间: 2011-10-10 14:41:14

到后面排量的优势就越发明显了

作者: ae101z 时间: 2011-10-10 14:42:10

good video

作者: jadecolin 时间: 2011-10-10 14:47:58