- UID
- 193083
- 热情
- 11086
- 人气
- 12306
- 主题
- 83
- 帖子
- 5021
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 14278
- 分享
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 相册
- 1
- 好友
- 19
- 日志
- 0
- 在线时间
- 3039 小时
- 注册时间
- 2009-7-23
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 最后登录
- 2024-4-12
- UID
- 193083
- 热情
- 11086
- 人气
- 12306
- 主题
- 83
- 帖子
- 5021
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 14278
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 注册时间
- 2009-7-23
|
你好,
你说的这个问题其实出示法律依据的责任在你的租客。 你应该让他出示他可以一分钱都不给的法律。
政府网站上的指导文章这么写: “The purpose of the legislation is to help tenants with their loss of income and for landlords and tenants to share the cost of the COVID-19 disruptions so that the tenant’s business remains viable.”
关键词是share, 就是分担。 他一分钱不付就不是分担了,
指导文章还写道
”Should the parties try to reduce their loss of income?
The parties are expected to have tried to reduce their losses during the affected rental period (in other words, the parties have done what they reasonably can to minimise costs and their loss of income).
For example, if a tenant could generate sales via click and collect, door sales or online sales, but chose not to, then this may be taken into account in determining a fair proportion.“
也就是说, 零售也是应该尽量做网购或click and pick up.
你的这个问题, 看金额多少, 也许应该找律师。 |
|