- UID
- 365410
- 热情
- 17695
- 人气
- 19066
- 主题
- 32
- 帖子
- 1493
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 19195
- 分享
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 相册
- 0
- 好友
- 10
- 日志
- 0
- 在线时间
- 5034 小时
- 注册时间
- 2013-9-20
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 最后登录
- 2024-11-7
升级 83.9% - UID
- 365410
- 热情
- 17695
- 人气
- 19066
- 主题
- 32
- 帖子
- 1493
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 19195
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 注册时间
- 2013-9-20
|
本帖最后由 nb0580 于 2016-5-9 22:32 编辑
Iris99 发表于 2016-5-6 12:19
先把尊重放一边,我想知道这样的硬性要求规定是不是合法, 因为这个经理经常开一些歧视性的玩笑,比如说 ...
首先,你或许可以把那个经理的行为理解成歧视,也或许可以理解成个傻二缺无知或者心里有什么直接说了,不会腹诽,只会表露出来。你的老板/同事没法合法强制你说任何一种语言,除非有其他法规约束的特定情形,但是跟中国同事在工作场所说太多的中文真的不好,我们单位总部办公室里白人主体,少数民族少,就俩华人,我跟她之间就在茶水间谈私事儿时候说点中文,另外三个印度同事之间也就私下场合他们自己叽里咕噜,平时都是英文,这是对别人的礼貌;
其次,甚至英语不是新西兰法规强制的官方语言,请看如下报道:
It's a secret on the tip of everyone's tongue: English is not an official language in New Zealand.
Te reo and sign both have Official Language status under law, but English does not. Although it is used by custom in the courts, Parliament and throughout the public sector, only the Tax Administration Act legally requires records to be kept in English.
..........................................................
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/ ... uage-in-New-Zealand
然后,看法规:
(一)人权法(Human Rights Act 1993)- Section 63 Racial harassment(1)
It shall be unlawful for any person to use language (whether written or spoken), or visual material, or physical behaviour that—
(a) expresses hostility against, or brings into contempt or ridicule, any other person on the ground of the colour, race, or ethnic or national origins of that person; and
(b) is hurtful or offensive to that other person (whether or not that is conveyed to the first-mentioned person); and
(c) is either repeated, or of such a significant nature, that it has a detrimental effect on that other person in respect of any of the areas to which this subsection is applied by subsection (2).
我个人的理解:根据(a),由于一个人的肤色、种族、民族或者国家,而通过言语、视觉媒介或者肢体行为所表达敌意、轻视或者嘲笑,都算作种族骚扰。
(二)人权法(Human Rights Act 1993)- Section 63 Racial harassment(2)
The areas to which subsection (1) applies are—
(a) the making of an application for employment:
(b) employment, which term includes unpaid work:
........(和本题无关,不列出来了)........
就是说上文属于种族骚扰的情形,在这些地点发生的话,就算,其中根据(b),就包括了工作场所。
(三)雇佣关系法(Employment Relations Act 2000) - Section 109 Racial harassment
For the purposes of sections 103(1)(e) and 123(d), an employee is racially harassed in the employee’s employment if the employee’s employer or a representative of that employer uses language (whether written or spoken), or visual material, or physical behaviour that directly or indirectly—
(a) expresses hostility against, or brings into contempt or ridicule, the employee on the ground of the race, colour, or ethnic or national origins of the employee; and
(b) is hurtful or offensive to the employee (whether or not that is conveyed to the employer or representative); and
(c) has, either by its nature or through repetition, a detrimental effect on the employee’s employment, job performance, or job satisfaction.
跟人权法规定的情形差不多,然后你在工作场所遇到种族骚扰,可以根据雇佣关系法Section 103(1)(e)提起申诉。
如果楼主决定投诉,可以向Human Rights Commission(人权委员会)投诉,参照下面链接:
http://employment.govt.nz/infozo ... /discrimination.asp
也可以向Employment Relations Authority(雇佣关系局)投诉,参考下面链接:
http://era.govt.nz/
以上,是根据法律法规来做的解答,楼主的情况是否属于种族歧视或者种族骚扰,可以自行咨询人权委员会。
--------------------------------(分割线)------------------------------------
你要真觉得有必要采取如上法律措施的话,希望上面可以帮到你。但是你可以更合理地处理这个问题,比如跟人事部门或者你老板谈一下这个问题,可以带上上面那些法律的规定,跟他们说清楚,你是懂法的,只是为了保护公司声誉、出于维护同事的面子,才没采取法律行动。我相信你老板和公司会尽快帮你解决这个问题,毕竟万一你采取了法律措施后,不管最终谁输谁赢,对公司来说都是个麻烦。
但是,你一旦要把这件事提高到种族歧视层面,你就千万不要在那么多同事面前说你觉得被歧视之类的,尽管他们可能表面上觉得你说得有理,但可能会觉得你玻璃心,要说,就直接找老板或者人事部门,一对一、面对面郑重其事地谈比较好。
我个人觉得,这种人你不理就得了呗,同事心里都是有一杆秤的,都知道谁是无赖,你要是只是觉得心里有口气,不是“出离愤怒”了,那这种方式可能比较合理。
--------------------------------(分割线)------------------------------------
要是实在忍不住要按最高标准来处理这件事情的话 ,就要注意收集好足够的证据,欲先使其亡,就必先使其狂,别反对他发挥甚至默许纵容变相鼓励,证据收集的途径我就不赘述了,也不好乱说,你可以咨询专业的律师或者有关部门,因为这种事情一旦你打算拍了就狠命拍死,要不就别轻举妄动,正所谓“潜龙勿用”。
其实,这种低级别的歧视你还好反击,要是在一个洋人众多的单位里,人家见你东亚人特别勤快,特别喜欢把工作甩给你,人家洋人每天按部就班不紧不慢的,你好不容易干完一个case正要歇歇,你的头儿立马以其他人都忙为由甩给你新的一个让你干,然后财年底的时候,人家洋人chuachua升senior,然后你做着一样的工作甚至更多,顶多给你年薪涨1000,这样你更糟心。
另外,本人不是法律从业人员,上述意见不代表专业从业人员的观点。 |
-
2
查看全部评分
-
|