- UID
- 14163160
- 热情
- 1641
- 人气
- 1663
- 主题
- 42
- 帖子
- 521
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 1937
- 分享
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 相册
- 0
- 好友
- 0
- 日志
- 0
- 在线时间
- 175 小时
- 注册时间
- 2024-4-27
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 最后登录
- 2024-8-13
升级 93.7% - UID
- 14163160
- 热情
- 1641
- 人气
- 1663
- 主题
- 42
- 帖子
- 521
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 1937
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 注册时间
- 2024-4-27
|
unicornnz小号蹦跶贴
First Union says comments about the driver by Simeon Brown were unfair as drivers are not trained like police officers to intervene in violent incidents involving weapons that could escalate and put themselves at risk of harm.
“They’re bus drivers, not police officers,” Maga said.
“They’re neither paid nor trained appropriately to physically intervene against aggressors carrying weapons and potentially compromise their own safety in the workplace.
“As a union, our advice to drivers is not to intervene in incidents of violence on buses where there is a possibility of escalation and further harm to the driver or other passengers.
上述言论极端错误,可见这个First Union的秘书长Dennis Maga法律意识有多么淡薄,岂能以司机不是警察轻描淡写给公交公司洗地。
依照《Health and Safety at Work Act 2015》36条第2款:
36 Primary duty of care
(2)A PCBU must ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that the health and safety of other persons is not put at risk from work carried out as part of the conduct of the business or undertaking.
公交公司作为PCBC企事业经营者主体,有法律义务在开展经营活动时候保障other person的健康安全,这里的other person是除了其员工,也就是公交车司机以外的所有人员,特别应该包括乘客,这里的保障不单单是阻止危险发生,还包括紧急情况干预和事后处理
*************************************************************************************************
乘客不但在other person范围内,还有别于在公交车周围经过的行人,所以乘客是典型的消费者,适用《Consumer Guarantees Act 1993》第四部分 第28条
Part 4
Supply of services
28Guarantee as to reasonable care and skill
Subject to section 41, where services are supplied to a consumer there is a guarantee that the service will be carried out with reasonable care and skill.
Compare: Trade Practices Act 1974 s 74(1) (Aust); Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s 13 (UK)
很明显这样的公交服务没有任何 reasonable care可言
*************************************************************************************************
同时公交公司涉嫌违反《Land Transport Act 1998》第八条
8 Drivers not to be careless or inconsiderate
A person may not drive a vehicle, or cause a vehicle to be driven, carelessly or without reasonable consideration for other persons
Section 8: substituted, on 22 June 2005, by section 7 of the Land Transport Amendment Act 2005 (2005 No 77).
公交公司招聘这些新闻里报道的来自于印度Kerala和Manila的司机,他们是否具有和本地土生土长的人一样相同的consideration for other persons? 如果没有那么都不适合开车,更不要说是做公交司机。
**************************************************************************************************
这件事情很明显公家公司负有责任,甚至厚着脸皮拿近年有多少司机被攻击来博得同情,作为公交公司在如此频繁的发案情况下,一没有保障司机安全,二不采取措施保障乘客安全,很明显是渎职行为。
如银行不安装防弹玻璃或者保安笼,或不配备保安,致使银行工作人员或顾客被劫匪伤害,你能说银行没有责任?我们是不要求银行工作人员和警察一样反击劫匪,那么作为营业主体的银行采取了哪些措施保障员工和顾客安全?
|
-
5
查看全部评分
-
|