ZT: 哇塞！！！这个回国回得太太太值了！！！省了18Mil

ETA_Wai

怎么没见你讨论一群阿三被捕，还有三个被通缉的新闻

Domani

ETA_Wai 发表于 2019-9-26 12:44
怎么没见你讨论一群阿三被捕，还有三个被通缉的新闻

你可以发出来讨论讨论啊

ETA_Wai

Domani 发表于 2019-9-26 12:47
你可以发出来讨论讨论啊

诈骗这里的人被抓了而已，还是三外有三更有趣

中国负面新闻说不得

呼啸寒风

返送中，支持啊！！！哈哈

anzac_corp

老賴啊

前面有報道説他剛好有縂價18m的兩個物業在新西蘭，拍賣掉夠了

skysadness

没有引渡条约  反送中，就是这样

bungyjumping999

China won't recognize civil law of NZ. Furthermore, Yan is a nominee of the Chinese state enterprise. Do you think the Chinese Court will recognize NZ judgment?  (under the close watch of the Party).

There is no mutual enforcement of judgment signed between NZ and China (Treaty). So, it is dreaming for NZ to think they can get Yan personally.

Before the Chinese government bought up Mainzeal, it was near collapsed, they should be thankful now rather than still wanting to milk some more money.

bungyjumping999

anzac_corp 发表于 2019-9-26 13:21
老賴啊

前面有報道説他剛好有縂價18m的兩個物業在新西蘭，拍賣掉夠了

These properties are untouchable, it belong to the trust. Yan and family only has the right to stay, do not own it technically.
In another word, this is only paper judgment, worth nothing in real term. Only the media get excited.

sdpapet

我是小老鼠 发表于 2019-9-26 12:43
自沙

请问这个和P2P暴雷跑路是不是异曲同工之妙，只是一个往外跑，一个往回跑？

sdpapet

我是小老鼠 发表于 2019-9-26 12:43
自沙

不是很明白这里面的背景和提到insurer。一般宣布破产都是公司或是个人比如生意亏本了等等。这种做生意可以进行保险？文中提到其他三个人有insurer cover那些损失。难道保险公司还保险这些？不知道做什么生意。

bungyjumping999

sdpapet 发表于 2019-9-26 17:12
不是很明白这里面的背景和提到insurer。一般宣布破产都是公司或是个人比如生意亏本了等等。这种做生意可 ...

There is a professional indemnity insurance for Independent directors in the case of Public listed Company. the company has to pay a high premium.

The insurance covers unintended mistakes, negligence etc. They are lucky this time that the insurance is willing to step in, may be because there was ex-prime minister involved.
Yan is not independent, he is an executive director.

The liquidators sued all the directors for reckless trading causing losses.  This is a difficult case to prove, but they proved it in the sense that while the Company was near insolvency, they continued trading and making people think they are solvent therefore reckless and incur a lot of debts during that period.

What sink this company was some unprofitable projects and some leaky projects, that came back to bite them.

sdpapet

bungyjumping999 发表于 2019-9-26 17:41
There is a professional indemnity insurance for Independent directors in the case of Public listed ...

我听说过这个，但是不是每种行业，每宗交易都可以保的，但是大概向你说的有前首相在，所以保险公司理赔就当是打广告了。这个另外的中国人当初也应该买这个保险。

bungyjumping999

sdpapet 发表于 2019-9-26 17:45
我听说过这个，但是不是每种行业，每宗交易都可以保的，但是大概向你说的有前首相在，所以保险公司理赔就 ...

not as simple as that. Yan is not qualified for that insurance as he is not independent, he has a vested interest in the company, shareholder as well.

当无赖是可耻的。他在新西兰有财产，走法律程序就好了。好在有财产，不然债权人太无辜了！必须要求中国引渡回新西兰，判刑。

匿名者 发表于 2019-9-26 17:50
当无赖是可耻的。他在新西兰有财产，走法律程序就好了。好在有财产，不然债权人太无辜了！必须要求中国引渡 ...

文章说的欠1.8 million，新西兰的财产不知道多少，如果不够或是都转会国内了，就是都变卖了也估计差很多的。