- UID
- 192805
- 热情
- 4869
- 人气
- 6393
- 主题
- 14
- 帖子
- 6271
- 精华
- 2
- 积分
- 8813
- 分享
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 相册
- 0
- 好友
- 0
- 日志
- 0
- 在线时间
- 3589 小时
- 注册时间
- 2009-7-22
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 最后登录
- 2022-6-18
![Rank: 4](static/image/common/star_level3.gif)
- UID
- 192805
- 热情
- 4869
- 人气
- 6393
- 主题
- 14
- 帖子
- 6271
- 精华
- 2
- 积分
- 8813
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 注册时间
- 2009-7-22
|
下面的案例所说的是关于树木遮挡景色的,和邻居房屋遮挡阳光有类似的效果,基本上,法律对批准的建筑许可很难推翻,只能通过interference with enjoyment of land 这类common law 法律制约。但是,要通过法庭让common law 大过resource management act 的难度是很大的。
Houses are often built in ways that take advantage of the property’s view. It can be distressing when that view becomes blocked by your neighbours’ trees. You may wonder what you can do about it, given that the trees do not belong to you. Rest assured that the law can provide some relief.
The law on removing trees blocking your view
The Property Law Act provides a remedy for people adversely affected by trees on neighbouring properties to obtain a Court order for their removal. The Court has discretion as to whether it will make the order, but can require the owner of land upon which trees are located to trim or remove the trees if they unduly obstruct the views enjoyed by a neighbouring property.
The Court’s discretion is not as wide as it may appear; there are some restrictions on the Court’s power. The Court’s discretion to make an order for removal of trees is to be exercised cautiously. The Court may only make an order if it is permitted to do so after having regard to all the relevant circumstances. The Court must consider whether the order to remove trees is fair, reasonable and necessary to prevent an undue obstruction of the view that would otherwise be enjoyed from your land, and whether a refusal to make the order would cause hardship to you, that is greater than the hardship that would be caused to your neighbours.
The restrictions on the exercise of the Court’s discretion do not end there. In determining whether to make an order, the Court must also take into account:
• Whether the trees complained of were already there when you purchased the land;
• The interests of the public in the maintenance of an aesthetically pleasing environment;
• The desirability of protecting public reserves containing trees;
• The value of the tree as a public amenity;
• Any historical, cultural, or scientific significant of the tree.
After considering all these things, an order may be made if, in all the circumstances, “the Court thinks fit”. |
|
在艾美斯律师事务所,我们会为客户利益一争到底,敢于挑战司法的不公正。无论案件轻重,事无大小,意在执着,提供电话咨询。我们办理的案件领域包括房地产生意买卖,信托基金,各类移民案件,家庭法,刑事出庭,交通法,商业纠纷,法律意见,债务,公司法,合同,民事纠纷,小额度争议案件,谈判等各类法律服务。
办公室: 09-969 1493 传真: 09-969 1492
法律事务:苏小姐 021-08956107
电邮:info@adventark.co.nz 微信:AdventArkLawyers
地址: Level 6, 300 Queen Street, Auckland City.
|