本帖最后由 匿名 于 2020-10-10 15:08 编辑
loszsy2011 发表于 2020-10-10 14:48 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62cab/62cabb7b95976332e02eb5e5c263c6d39e9ee2f2" alt=""
女儿是这个法案规定下的安乐死死掉的吗?不然混淆视听偷换概念?
If the law is passed, the daughter would be able to make her choice because she is 18.
This is an hypothetical case.
"
NOTES from the director:
This film is not against euthanasia.
I’m not trying to present an argument against the End of Life Choice Act. After all, it’s a film, not an essay.
But I do want to give Kiwis another chance to think before they vote. And I hope everyone will recognise the difference between talking about morality of euthanasia and saying euthanasia should be legal or not.
I wanted to point out a few things that people may not know about the End of Life Choice Act, in the hopes that people will not rely solely on their intuition or personal experience, but instead, spend an hour looking at what the proponents and the opponents of the act are saying on their websites.
Listen to the experts. There is a reason why Hospice NZ and Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners are against the act and why over a thousand NZ doctors have signed an open letter petition to the parliament.
Palliative care can manage most physical pain and illnesses, and it is impossible to allow euthanasia to only the people who have no alternative under the End of Life Choice Act. If this is true, shouldn’t we focus on medical treatment and research to provide palliative care to more people and find better ways to treat illnesses instead of assisting suicide?
Kill the problem, not the people with them.
[color=var(--blue-link)]https://www.stuff.co.nz/.../step-dave-star-features-in..."
Source: https://www.facebook.com/theblac ... LwGGeoT5xmxsgTj7gDM
|