本帖最后由 白胡子 于 2019-12-4 07:34 编辑
白胡子 发表于 2019-12-3 21:02 
说起头像...请把头像和签名改了好吗...这帖子我不想删但是这样下去还是要在透露他人隐私的版规下给警告和 ...
那么麻烦，不如我发个声明，我承担这个帖子里面内容的全部责任包括隐私，一切与Skykiwi无关。要发律师函直接发给我。那你就不怕收什么律师函，我又可以继续曝光。不然你这样搞我会心里不平衡，当初这个房我就是在skykiwi找的，现在吃了我的钱又不让我曝光。没有这样的道理。你同意我马上发个声明，接管这个帖里面的责任。
我当初是在这边找到这个骗子的招租才会被骗，也就是说这个骗子还继续在这边招租，你这样搞，还会其他受害者在这边受骗，我会法律可以自己讨公道，其他人怎么办，Bond不是少数目啊大哥，上千纽币，10个人都上万纽币了，谁要帮这些受害者讨公道？原本这些受害者看到这个帖可以避免被骗，但是你屏蔽了，谁看到？你要不要承担一些责任呢？良心过意得去吗？我们都是用血汗来赚钱，家里没用矿。
我已经问过律师了，Court Order不是什么隐私，是公共文件，大众有权利查阅。可以放心分享。我不是随便乱乱发人家的资料。这个是法庭文件。如果还是坚持要屏蔽，我会很怀疑Skykiwi在包庇骗子
[size=1.1em]Exemptions from the Act
Only a few organisations and people are not 'agencies'. Other rules exist to govern how they manage personal information, so the Privacy Act does not cover what they do. Organisations that aren't covered by the Privacy Act include: - Members of Parliament, when they are acting as MPs. It's up to Parliament or political parties to discipline MPs for breaches of privacy
- courts and tribunals, in relation to their judicial functions. You have to challenge judicial decisions through the normal processes, such as an appeal
- The news media when they are conducting their news activities. The Press Council, the Broadcasting Standards Authority and the courts govern the news media.
| 
发表于 2019-12-2 04:46:27
