- UID
- 339792
- 热情
- 16365
- 人气
- 21920
- 主题
- 204
- 帖子
- 4460
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 21564
- 分享
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 相册
- 2
- 好友
- 0
- 日志
- 0
- 在线时间
- 8983 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-9-1
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 最后登录
- 2025-3-10
    
升级   7.82% - UID
- 339792
- 热情
- 16365
- 人气
- 21920
- 主题
- 204
- 帖子
- 4460
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 21564
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 注册时间
- 2012-9-1
|
本帖最后由 bungyjumping999 于 2018-12-22 13:41 编辑
just lengthy litigation to prove a few points for this kind of cases.
1) is it a gift or a loan?
2) if it is a loan, the money will be repaid back to the mother.
3) the balance will still be shared half and half ( eg Capital increase on the property).
If there is a proof the money comes from the mother, normally it can be argued that the daughter holds the money as a constructive trustee for the mother even though there is no loan agreement in place.
This requires lengthy argument and facts to built up the case of constructive trust.
Easy peasy, of course not many people understand this concept (constructive trust), which is a western common law creature. |
|