- UID
- 339792
- 热情
- 16285
- 人气
- 21840
- 主题
- 204
- 帖子
- 4460
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 21484
- 分享
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 相册
- 2
- 好友
- 0
- 日志
- 0
- 在线时间
- 8978 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-9-1
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 最后登录
- 2025-3-4
    
升级   7.42% - UID
- 339792
- 热情
- 16285
- 人气
- 21840
- 主题
- 204
- 帖子
- 4460
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 21484
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 注册时间
- 2012-9-1
|
本帖最后由 bungyjumping999 于 2018-11-17 12:18 编辑
Average (not so good) bank customers (those with higher loan margins) basically won't change and can't change bank as the refinancing bank is not willing to take them on.
This 3.95% are targetted at good customers who are willing to change bank and banks are willing to fight for them to take them on. Good customers are people with proper documentation for incomes and expenses, and proper job on record.
Why?
In Australia, there is a potential class action suing the banks for irresponsible lendings. They want banks to write off the amount that they can't afford to pay ( haha...). Sound familiar? "you shouldn't have lent me the money, not my fault"
- The banks are now looking at their books and see who they can get rid off. Before getting rid of some clients (whom they think they should not have lent the money to), they want to take on good clients first.
- Impact of tax against negative gearing and potential Capital gain tax. The banks are taking preventive measures on some of those investor clients. If the banks can smell trouble ahead before it is implemented, they will get rid of them earlier than later.
- Banks' safer bet is on first home buyers, stable income, family-owned borrowers ( back to basis)
- Situations are pretty bad in Australia, banks might face negative equity. In NZ, they have to juggle lending that was made to overseas investors few years ago and Post 22/10. haha....
The economic algorithm is slowly forming...
|
|