- UID
- 121072
- 热情
- 1190
- 人气
- 1679
- 主题
- 45
- 帖子
- 597
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1764
- 分享
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 相册
- 1
- 好友
- 0
- 日志
- 0
- 在线时间
- 804 小时
- 注册时间
- 2007-6-21
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 最后登录
- 2024-11-17
升级 76.4% - UID
- 121072
- 热情
- 1190
- 人气
- 1679
- 主题
- 45
- 帖子
- 597
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1764
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 注册时间
- 2007-6-21
|
事情是这样,上周房客开车把家里的车库门给撞了。 根据他的描述是拉了手刹,但挡位还是挂在D挡所以车子把车库门给撞了,当时我在家,他撞的那一下声音很大,还好车库门结实只是一部分有刮痕和掉漆,所以我要求他负责。 他的车子有第三险,但是他跟我说保险公司不负责。
原因是在网上有一则这样的案件:In a recent Court of Appeal judgment (Holler v Osaki [2016] NZCA 130) the Court held that the insurer (AMI) could not recover $216,000 worth of damage from the tenant of a residential property (Mr Osaki) caused by a fire from a pot of oil which had been left on a stove unattended. AMI had paid out the Landlord (Mr Holler) and then sought to recover the $216,000 from the tenant. In coming to this decision the task before the Court of Appeal was not an easy one - to interpret and reconcile the various statutory provisions in the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 and the Property Law Act 2007.然后他说根据这个网站(www.nwm.co.nz/damage-to-rental-property-who-is-liable)是写If the damage is caused by the carelessness of the tenant (or someone at the property with the tenant’s permission), then tenant will not be liable to the extent the landlord is insured for the loss所以他不用负责,如果我要把门弄好我就得找我的保险公司弄好,还得我自己出钱.
请问是这样回事吗?要是以后他不管弄坏家里任何东西不全是我负责?
|
|