ZT:以后挑学校全靠黑羊系统了，Decile制可能要废除

NewLynnHse

http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/po ... rgeted-funding.html

School decile system to be scrapped for targeted funding

The decile system, which is currently used to decide school funding, is to be scrapped, with an alternative called the 'Predictive Risk Index' lined up to replace it.

It will track individual at-risk students and then use that information to target funding directly to schools.

Under the decile system, schools are ranked from one to 10 based on the socio-economic status of their communities, which determines funding.

But under the Predictive Risk Index, individual students are deemed "at risk" after being assessed by Government data and a school's funding is based on the number of students it has with risk factors.

"This is very much going to be a much more specific approach than the decile funding allows," Education Minister Hekia Parata told Newshub.

The Government will use its pool of data to identify students from families on a benefit, with brothers or sisters who have been victims of abuse, or parents that have been in prison.

But privacy has sprung out as an obvious concern.

"The technology is there, and there is no intention to identify - in fact we will ensure that children aren't identified, that their privacy is protected," Ms Parata said.

The Primary School Teachers Union is worried it could shift the stigma from schools onto students.

"In the past we've had stigmatising of low decile schools, will that mean that individual children will be stigmatised?" NZ Educational Institute President Lynda Stuart told Newshub.

Another concern is that while some schools could gain funding, others will lose it.

"I certainly think that some schools could be at risk of losing funding," Ms Stuart said.

Ms Parata said whether schools could lose funding is something "for the future" - but her political future is limited as she retires as Minister in three weeks.

Her goal is to get this signed off as her last project.

Newshub.

zy27289833

所以学区房还是会保值最起码

呼啸寒风

以后就直接按种族肤色来选学校了，很好

NewLynnHse

呼啸寒风 发表于 2017-4-12 10:10
以后就直接按种族肤色来选学校了，很好

其实以后那个新的算法要是有公布数据的话，更有参考价值。因为每个学校的“问题学生”有多少就一目了然了。。。哈哈

wnin001

换一个新的数据更好， 信息更全面。
从比例来说， Risk这个事情应该是和某个族裔特别相关。亚裔， 中日韩，应该是最不risky的。 呵呵。

呼啸寒风

NewLynnHse 发表于 2017-4-12 10:38
其实以后那个新的算法要是有公布数据的话，更有参考价值。因为每个学校的“问题学生”有多少就一目了然了 ...

毛岛多的学校问题学生多，因为毛岛问题学生多。。。跟监狱人口比例超标一样，种族隔离从娃娃开始，阶层固化从娘胎开始，没的救

政府已经开口要邀请黑帮成员进驻监狱解决毛利罪犯太多的问题，说白了就司法解决不了的问题给黑道来摆平。黑帮不但合法化更要进入主流的一部分

Venox10111

期待和关注新算法动向。。。

枯藤老树

那样是不是分数越低政府拨款最多，也就是分数越低学校越好呢？

房奴甲

是这么回事。黑羊系统就是发展这个阶段比较痛苦，过后就会成为最好用的。

love_3_month

枯藤老树 发表于 2017-4-12 11:31
那样是不是分数越低政府拨款最多，也就是分数越低学校越好呢？

本来就是啊，这个拨款可以理解为福利 --当然越穷的福利越多。

枯藤老树

love_3_month 发表于 2017-4-12 15:27
本来就是啊，这个拨款可以理解为福利 --当然越穷的福利越多。

现在不是，分数高虽然拨款少，但反映了家长收入高，受教育程度高。。这也是人们想要高分学校的原因。。

毕竟没人想自己的孩子天天和一帮穷白岛毛阿三难民的孩子在一起厮混啊。。。。

love_3_month

枯藤老树 发表于 2017-4-12 16:21
现在不是，分数高虽然拨款少，但反映了家长收入高，受教育程度高。。这也是人们想要高分学校的原因。。

...

一回事啦。

以前是看这个学校所在的区，然后按照区里的人的经济教育状况分 10级。经济最好的级数最高，拨款最少。

以后是看这个学校的具体学生情况，然后按照一定标准来评判家庭状况。状况最不好的，拨款最多。

总的思路是一样的。不过现在这个应该更到位一些。