- UID
- 120068
- 热情
- 9041
- 人气
- 10872
- 主题
- 163
- 帖子
- 4459
- 精华
- 2
- 积分
- 12334
- 分享
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 相册
- 0
- 好友
- 3
- 日志
- 0
- 在线时间
- 6239 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-7-12
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 最后登录
- 2022-6-28
   
升级   46.68% - UID
- 120068
- 热情
- 9041
- 人气
- 10872
- 主题
- 163
- 帖子
- 4459
- 精华
- 2
- 积分
- 12334
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 注册时间
- 2010-7-12
|
我是怎么了 发表于 2015-4-16 17:48 
乱讲 有些人的挡土墙不合规格就要拆了重新弄 每次检查的人都不一样的 再说政府他们也有很大责任的 可能有 ...
agree.
In addition, although Council did sub-contract a lot of inspectors all over Auckland (not just Flat Bush), but at end of the day Council give the sign-off CCC and is ultimatly responsible.
Whover inspect on behalf of Council don't make a difference.
It's hard to believe inspector will go as far as skip the site visit entirely. How do they take photos? What date/time they should put down in official record? If they dare to say they visited the site at xxx day xxx time without actually been that, that's forgery. Punishment is far more then just disqualified as engineer. I can't imagine any council approved engineer willing to risk so much just for 1 house inspection. |
|