interesting statistics

hoolee

LJCalvin

这是啥呀？？

dadawa

2.3m people are earning living for bloddy 2.1m people....

risenfan

dadawa 发表于 2012-9-4 16:59
2.3m people are earning living for bloddy 2.1m people....

做生意的算不？

叶紫苏

为啥males employed+females employed＜total employed..
难道有人即不算male 也不算female。。。

mirror0

Interesting Negative. Has it been always like this?

mirror0

kenneth 发表于 2012-9-5 01:31
同问，还有那个unemployment rate, 咋算出来的？4百万人口，只有2万多employed,有一半unemployed,不是吗？
...

Unemployed dose not count ppl not looking for jobs. I.e. stay home moms,retired.....

T.C.B.Y.

叶紫苏 发表于 2012-9-5 00:31
为啥males employed+females employed＜total employed..
难道有人即不算male 也不算female。。。

那些figures都是rounded to the nearest 1000, so they don't add up.

T.C.B.Y.

mirror0 发表于 2012-9-5 09:43
Unemployed dose not count ppl not looking for jobs. I.e. stay home moms,retired.....

That's right, population only based on those in the workforce and currently actively seeking job.

叶紫苏

T.C.B.Y. 发表于 2012-9-5 11:18
那些figures都是rounded to the nearest 1000, so they don't add up.

再round up 也不会有16W+的差值吧。。。这可是1000的160多倍。。我不觉得是这理由

头4个统计是based on sample的，也许这是造成这差值的原因，CI差不多在95%