CVT波箱的车发抖。

网络劝分党

换一下波箱油就好了，不管多严重。有些甚至到了开不了，换了油就好了。

波箱油很贵。多少钱？

happydog1314

Honda 的 CVT 油一罐3.5升约$87块，但做Flushing 至少要两罐，比起换波箱便宜太多。

~春天花花~

记得是352左右一次flush。。。。3-4桶油。。原厂的。。

爱国爱港

AVSTAR 发表于 2011-12-16 13:48
CVT拨箱很不靠谱!!!!!!!!!!!

这个我已经转贴了n次了

http://www.dogandlemon.com/articles/automatics-cvt-transmissions

CVT Transmissions

Back in the 1950s, some automatic transmissions had only two gears. Two-speed transmissions were a pain, because when you were going up a hill you only had two options: first or second gear; it screamed in first gear or lost power in second. Then, as you went faster, the transmission was screaming because it needed an extra gear but didn’t have one.

Two-speed automatics were not only inconvenient to use, but they robbed the car’s engine of much of its power and drank fuel like there was no tomorrow.

You may never notice it, but your four or five-speed automatic suffers from the same problems as the two-speed one described above: it never gets the gears quite right. That’s why cars with conventional automatics never put out quite as much power as those with a manual gearbox and almost always use more fuel.

In the 1950s, a Dutch company called DAF came up with a new type of automatic transmission that solved the problems described above. Instead of having a small, fixed number of gears, DAF’s gearbox simply made up the gearing as it went along; the DAF transmission could change itself internally to produce a wide range of different gears, each one perfectly suited to the road conditions and driving style of that vehicle. The Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) was born.

There are no fixed gears (e.g., first, second, third, and so on) in a CVT. The transmission simply invents the right gear at the right time. In theory a CVT is the ideal gearbox.

In practice, however, most modern CVT gearboxes suffer from the same problems as their ancestors: because they don’t have gears (like on the back wheel of a bicycle), many CVTs use belts instead, like the one that goes around your waist. The problem is, these transmission belts break, no matter how well they’re made. When they break, the whole transmission has to come out, generally for a complete overhaul at great expense. CVT gearboxes that use chains are better, but they still break.

The carmakers knew this when they put these CVT transmissions onto the market, but they also knew that most of the CVTs wouldn’t break until the vehicle was out of guarantee, meaning it wouldn’t be the carmakers’ problem. However, even that scam didn’t work: both Nissan’s and Honda’s CVTs have been subject to multiple recalls, some on almost-new vehicles. It’s possible that someone will eventually figure out how to build a CVT transmission that lasts as long as a conventional manual gearbox, but we’re not holding our breath. In the meantime, the evidence to date suggests that CVT transmissions can easily become a nightmare for car owners.

The fact that many CVT transmissions die young shouldn’t be your problem; the easiest option is to simply avoid CVT transmissions entirely!

pyzy001

爱国爱港 发表于 2011-12-16 16:26
这个我已经转贴了n次了

http://www.dogandlemon.com/articles/automatics-cvt-transmissions

cvt不行，普通的不行，手钹开不惯，那啥行？

爱国爱港

pyzy001 发表于 2011-12-16 17:12
cvt不行，普通的不行，手钹开不惯，那啥行？

普通带齿轮的自排怎么会不行?

大蛋

貌似就HONDA做得差些，我有个CVT的OUTLANDER，并没有什么问题，ANDREW SIMMS去做SERVICE也不算很贵

香肉肉

2003-2004年新款odyssey是cvt波箱吗？