【测试数据】奥迪RS5 VS 宝马M3 VS CTS-V

巫妖王之怒

1ST PLACE: BMW M3
The oldest car here, but like a good red wine, it's getting better with age. Driver-focused powertrain and chassis make it a scalpel among sledgehammers.

2ND PLACE: AUDI RS 5
Supremely confidence-inspiring and easy to drive fast, the RS 5 delivers a technical knockout, but at the price of driver involvement.

3RD PLACE: CADILLAC CTS-V COUPE
No shame here. Other than the subpar transmission, the Cadillac does an outstanding job of giving its German rivals a real run for the money.







Comparison: 2013 Audi RS 5 vs 2011 BMW M3 vs 2011 Cadillac CTS-V

	2013 Audi RS 5	2011 BMW M3	2011 Cadillac CTS-V
POWERTRAIN/CHASSIS
DRIVETRAIN LAYOUT	Front engine, AWD	Front engine, RWD	Front engine, RWD
ENGINE TYPE	90-deg V-8, alum block/heads	90-deg V-8, alum block/heads	Supercharged 90-deg V-8, alum block/heads
VALVETRAIN	DOHC, 4 valves/cyl	DOHC, 4 valves/cyl	OHV, 2 valves/cyl
DISPLACEMENT	254.1 cu in/4163 cc	2244.0 cu in/3999 cc	376.1 cu in/6162 cc
COMPRESSION RATIO	12.3:1	12.0:1	9.1:1
POWER (SAE NET)	444 hp @ 8250 rpm	414 hp @ 8300 rpm	556 hp @ 6100 rpm*
TORQUE (SAE NET)	317 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm	295 lb-ft @ 3900 rpm	551 lb-ft @ 3800 rpm*
REDLINE	8500 rpm	8400 rpm	6200 rpm
WEIGHT TO POWER	9.0 lb/hp	8.9 lb/hp	7.7 lb/hp
TRANSMISSION	7-speed twin-clutch auto	7-speed twin-clutch auto	6-speed automatic
AXLE/FINAL-DRIVE RATIOS	4.38:1/2.70:1	3.15:1/3.15:1	3.23:1/2.16:1
SUSPENSION, FRONT; REAR	Multilink, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar	Struts, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar	Control arms, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar
STEERING RATIO	13.3:1	12.5:1	16.1:1
TURNS LOCK-TO-LOCK	2.8	2.8	2.7
BRAKES, F;R	15.0-in vented, drilled carbon-ceramic disc; 12.8-in vented, drilled disc, ABS	14.2-in vented disc;13.8-in vented disc, ABS	15.0-in vented disc; 14.7-in vented disc, ABS
WHEELS	9.0 x 20-in, cast alum	9.0 x 19-in; 10.0 x 19-in, cast alum	9.0 x 19-in; 9.5 x 19-in, forged alum
TIRES	275/30R20 97Y Dunlop SP Sport Maxx GT R01245	245/35R19 93Y; 265/35R19 98Y Continental ContiSportContact3	255/40ZR19 96Y; 285/35ZR19 99Y Michelin Pilot Sport PS2
DIMENSIONS
WHEELBASE	108.3 in	108.7 in	113.4 in
TRACK, F/R	62.4/62.3 in	60.6/60.6 in	61.8/62.8 in
LENGTH X WIDTH X HEIGHT	183.0 x 73.2 x 53.8 in	181.8 x 71.0 x 55.8 in	188.5 x 74.1 x 55.9 in
TURNING CIRCLE	38.1 ft	38.4 ft	37.9 ft
CURB WEIGHT	3975 lb	3678 lb	4254 lb
WEIGHT DIST, F/R	58/42%	51/49%	54/46%
SEATING CAPACITY	4	4	4
HEADROOM, F/R	39.1/36.0 in	38.4/36.8 in	36.9/34.6 in
LEGROOM, F/R	41.3/31.9 in	41.8/33.7 in	42.4/35.0 in
SHOULDER ROOM, F/R	54.3/52.8 in	55.3/51.9 in	56.0/50.9 in
CARGO VOL, F/R	12.0 cu ft	11.0 cu ft	10.5 cu ft
TEST DATA
ACCELERATION TO MPH
0-30	1.5 sec	1.8 sec	1.7 sec
0-40	2.3	2.4	2.3
0-50	3.2	3.1	3.1
0-60	4.3	4.1	4.0
0-70	5.6	5.1	5.1
0-80	7.1	6.5	6.3
0-90	8.8	8.1	7.5
0-100	10.9	9.1	9.0
0-110	13.3	11.4	10.8
0-120	16.0	13.9	12.8
PASSING, 45-65 MPH	2.2 sec	1.9 sec	1.8 sec
QUARTER MILE	12.8 sec @ 108.2 mph	12.6 sec @ 113.2 mph	12.3 sec @ 117.7 mph
BRAKING, 60-0 MPH	101 ft	110 ft	108 ft
BRAKING, 100-0 MPH	295 ft	309 ft	293 ft
LATERAL ACCELERATION	0.97 g (avg)	0.95 g (avg)	0.93 g (avg)
TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH	2500 rpm	2900 rpm	1700 rpm
CONSUMER INFO
BASE PRICE	$71,000 (est)	$60,575	$64,290
PRICE AS TESTED	$78,500 (est)	$68,705	$69,785
STABILITY/TRACTION CONTROL	Yes/yes	Yes/yes	Yes/yes
AIRBAGS	Dual front, front side, f/r curtain	Dual front, front side, f/r curtain	Dual front, front side, f/r curtain
BASIC WARRANTY	4 yrs/50,000 miles	4 yrs/50,000 miles	4 yrs/50,000 miles
POWERTRAIN WARRANTY	4 yrs/50,000 miles	4 yrs/50,000 miles	5 yrs/100,000 miles
ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE	4 yrs/unlimited	4 yrs/unlimited	5 yrs/100,000 miles
FUEL CAPACITY	16.9 gal	16.6 gal	18.0 gal
EPA CITY/HWY ECON	15/22 mpg	14/20 mpg	12/18 mpg
CO2 EMISSIONS	1.11 lb/mile	1.20 lb/mile	1.37 lb/mile
MT OBS FUEL ECONOMY	13.3 mpg	13.9 mpg	11.8 mpg
RECOMMENDED FUEL	Unleaded premium	Unleaded premium	Unleaded premium
* SAE CERTIFIED

Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/1009_2010_audi_rs_5_vs_2011_bmw_m3_vs_2011_cadillac_cts_v_comparison/specs.html#ixzz0xXTUPdo0

夜螺丝

CTS的外形不错....
性能数据不是重点....
有没有回头率数据

baikal

M3对应 RS5啊，有RS4吗？

Tian.Tian

RS5和M3比CTSV贵不少呢吧！再说个人觉得咱们是没有机会去100%发挥爱车的性能的。

dude999

THINK M3 HANDLES THE BEST OF THE THREE

扮猪吃老虎

还是喜欢C63，M3不咋地！

andy3009

CTS-V 好车啊

wkwk123

依然情迷M3！！！！！！！！！！！！

Lonelygirl

{:5_281:} my new car come in,rs5~~~~~~~~~!

ERICGU

我也觉得 C63 AMG 比较帅点

A.J

M3,始终称王啊~~~综合还是第一

flyinbed

外形还是C63大气.....CTS-V也不错，而且价钱...