- UID
- 72798
- 热情
- 26288
- 人气
- 31463
- 主题
- 280
- 帖子
- 8532
- 精华
- 16
- 积分
- 33610
- 分享
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 相册
- 1
- 好友
- 5
- 日志
- 1
- 在线时间
- 29656 小时
- 注册时间
- 2006-5-11
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 最后登录
- 2024-9-28
升级 68.05% - UID
- 72798
- 热情
- 26288
- 人气
- 31463
- 主题
- 280
- 帖子
- 8532
- 精华
- 16
- 积分
- 33610
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 注册时间
- 2006-5-11
|
匿名者 发表于 2021-4-3 20:36
in an ideal world, the story might be what you described.
"但他问了无良律师说只要同居三年有孩子了.. ...
First of all, the house is trust asset, not her personal one.
Second, the dispute is at personal level which is only related to matrimonial property, ie, funds in their joint account. The house is not part of matrimonial property.
Third, LZ has clearly calculated how much her partner contributed. The amount is immaterial. Probably his lawyer will try best, but a reasonable judge will only look the facts. And the facts are clear-the partner has little contribution. |
|