在土质很好的地方,回填地段不是很好的建房地选择。你是地质师吗?在以下链接看看你们权威们是如何评价回填地段的(Generally, fill is unlikely to meet the required bearing capacity )。相信看完这篇文章,你给顾客谈有关回填的建议会慎重些。 http://www.level.org.nz/site-ana ... d-ground-stability/作者: songinator 时间: 2020-10-9 08:57:00
歇着去 engineered fill tested and certified will pass while dump fill won't.
I thought LZ said it has been certified.
I certify backfilling of sediment pond for industrial, residential and infrastructure all the time to satisfy geotechnical ultimate bearing capacity of 300kPa all the time which achieves the required bearing capacity. Example below,
the certified fill and undisturbed original ground within residential lot boundaries is generally suitable for residential buildings with an ultimate geotechnical (rupture) bearing capacity of 300kPa be adopted for conventional shallow footing design subject to AS2870:2011 expansive soil class requirement, designed and constructed in accordance with NZS 3604:2011 and related documents.作者: park45 时间: 2020-10-9 09:41:21
songinator 发表于 2020-10-9 08:57
歇着去 engineered fill tested and certified will pass while dump fill won't.
会。。。。。。。。。。because engineered fill signed of by engineer will be better than some of the natural ground in west and south auckland.作者: park45 时间: 2020-10-9 13:50:49