新西兰天维网社区

标题: ZT: Decile制将要废除，现在的学区房何去何从？ [打印本页]

作者: NewLynnHse 时间: 2017-7-31 14:46:24 标题: ZT: Decile制将要废除，现在的学区房何去何从？

学区房会不会变成烫手山芋？还是新的制度只是换汤不换药？拭目以待

School funding system to get a shake-up
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11897218

The Government has confirmed it will replace the decile school funding system with one that targets money according to how many "at risk" children schools have enrolled.

Education Minister Nikki Kaye made the announcement this afternoon.

The decile system is based on the area from which a school draws its students. But attaching a number to each school has meant some parents avoid lower-decile schools, mistakenly linking a decile number with the quality of education.

Former Education Minister Hekia Parata has previously said a statistical "risk" index can target funding in a more "fine-grained way" by estimating for each student how at risk of educational underachievement they are.

It uses a range of indicators relating to each child, including how old the mother was at their birth, how many siblings the child has, parental income, father's offending history, and the child's ethnicity.

The Government is already testing a version of "at-risk" school funding. Schools this year did not get a general increase to operations funding to cover inflation. Instead, schools get $92 in extra funding for each student from a long-term, welfare-dependent background.

The at risk index would be a more sophisticated way to target extra money and would dish out far more money too.

"For too long schools have been stigmatised and wrongly judged by their decile number," Kaye said.

"Children and young people deserve to take pride in their school and we need to better target funding to where the need is greatest to support all children to achieve.

"Today I'm announcing that the Cabinet has agreed to replace the decile system with a Risk Index that allows us to better target funding to schools with children and young people most at risk of not achieving due to disadvantage.

"We will also be replacing the equity index used to allocate disadvantage funding in early childhood education with the Risk Index."

Kaye said the specific factors to be used in the index had not yet been finalised.

"However, I'm pleased to be able to confirm that no school, early learning service or ngā kōhanga reo will see a reduction in their funding as a direct result of this change.

"In fact, we expect some will gain significantly."

作者: jsmith2 时间: 2017-7-31 14:49:43

wow...房價進一步調整

作者: rzrljb 时间: 2017-7-31 14:49:50

所以我只看黑羊校区评分！

作者: 261874939 时间: 2017-7-31 14:51:56

保持关注

作者: jsmith2 时间: 2017-7-31 14:53:32

rzrljb 发表于 2017-7-31 14:49
所以我只看黑羊校区评分！

只買評分達到10的校區

作者: rzrljb 时间: 2017-7-31 14:58:16

jsmith2 发表于 2017-7-31 14:53
只買評分達到10的校區

这个真买不起

，我就是看看

作者: 鬼武魂 时间: 2017-7-31 15:08:12

不是早就说了么，怎么还没废除？

作者: mwe24 时间: 2017-7-31 15:47:09

鬼武魂发表于 2017-7-31 15:08
不是早就说了么，怎么还没废除？

要 cabinet 批准的。。今天已经投票批准了。。。要进入 implementation了

作者: 呼啸寒风 时间: 2017-7-31 16:36:25

本帖最后由呼啸寒风于 2017-7-31 16:38 编辑

The index will be finalised as part of the next stage of work, including which factorsare included. The factors being considered include:
 Proportion of time spent supported by benefits since birth
 Child has a Child, Youth and Family notification
 Mother’s age at child’s birth
 Father’s offending and sentence history
 Ethnicity
 Youth Justice referral
 Benefit mother unqualified
 Proportion of time spent overseas since birth
 Mother’s average earned income over the previous 5 years
 School transience
 Country of birth
 Father’s average earned income over the previous 5 years
 Migrant /New Zealand born
 Number of children (mother)
 Mother received third tier benefits (payments directed to alleviating hardship)
 Most recent benefit male caregiver is not the birth father.

作者: sun2kiwi 时间: 2017-7-31 19:56:19

提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: Venox10111 时间: 2017-7-31 20:17:40

教育部不管是怎么做这个 index, 都是带着贫富的有色眼镜看待教育。
SchoolScore 是就用学习成绩来看待学校的，这就有本质的区别。

作者: rockfield 时间: 2017-7-31 20:29:42

Venox10111 发表于 2017-7-31 20:17
教育部不管是怎么做这个 index, 都是带着贫富的有色眼镜看待教育。
SchoolScore 是就用学习成绩来看待学校 ...

可是用学习成绩来给学习评分效果不一样吗, 不也是好学校校区的房产价值会远超差校校网区的房子吗? 我看只有实施不画校区学生凭考试分数入才能达到调整房屋价格差距的作用。

作者: mnstar 时间: 2017-7-31 20:48:10

提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: icesolomon 时间: 2017-8-1 09:37:17

下一步就是把school zone 取消掉了吧，这个评分的更改完全是本末倒置嘛，risk index = 10 - decile 算下就好了，还是说之前 decile = 10 - risk index ?

作者: Quad 时间: 2017-8-1 09:40:30

Venox10111 发表于 2017-7-31 20:17
教育部不管是怎么做这个 index, 都是带着贫富的有色眼镜看待教育。
SchoolScore 是就用学习成绩来看待学校 ...

恩

作者: Quad 时间: 2017-8-1 09:40:53

mnstar 发表于 2017-7-31 20:48
说梦话呢??Papakura尖子生去Westlake上学?累断他爸妈的腿啊

也是

作者: 呼啸寒风 时间: 2017-8-1 10:19:26

是骡子是马其实出了NZ才知道，将来他们的竞争对手不是住在NZ的kiwi和岛毛，而是NZ以外英美澳加华裔后代和数不清的国内富裕阶层送去国际学校或者英美澳加从小接受西方教育的二代们，从这个角度说NZ华裔后代的竞争力只会越来越差

欢迎光临新西兰天维网社区 (http://bbs.skykiwi.com/)