新西兰天维网社区

标题: ZT: 漏水房修完了还是卖不上价 [打印本页]

作者: NewLynnHse 时间: 2017-1-7 21:16:54 标题: ZT: 漏水房修完了还是卖不上价

房事高潮估计已经过去，在只要是块砖就能卖出去的时候没有脱手的，应该是得砸手里了。所以说，还是别碰的好，你去跟人家解释年代，cavity什么的，都是扯淡，没几个人会明白的。

还有就是政府那个在未来30年里要盖40多万套房子的计划，就是跟上一个“building boom of the 1990s and early 2000s”一样，肯定又会出现一大批的豆腐渣房子。然后又得忙着擦屁股了。。。哈哈

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11770278

Repaired leaky homes worth 1/4 less

The stigma of leaky homes is so great that home owners could stand to lose almost a quarter of their property's value - even after it has been repaired to current building standards.

New research, due to be published in early 2017 has found the price of certain homes built in the 1990s and 2000s, could drop up to 21 per cent - almost $300,000 on the average Auckland house price or just over $130,000 for the national house price.

Titled Leaky Building Stigma: Can it be Eliminated by Remediation, the Massey University research showed there was still a public perception that saw monolithic clad homes (those most commonly linked to weather-tightness issues) as being problematic - irrespective of their actual condition.

Researchers Song Shi, Iona McCarthy and Uyen Mai undertook a qualitative survey of 114 property professionals and used a statistical model to establish that general market stigma around such properties, regardless of condition, led to an 11 per cent discount in value.

A five to 10 per cent "post-remediation stigma" discount also applied dependent on the scale of the issue. This could be reduced to 3.73 per cent if the buildings were re-clad with a more "traditional look" not linked to leaky buildings.

Lead researcher Song Shi said stigma could linger for up to 15 years post repairs, driven by concern about monitoring, financing and marketing and general "uncertainty" as to the buildings' robustness.

"It doesn't matter if a building is leaky or not, sound or not, because the market can't tell and it's costly for the home owners to identify the problem."

Monolithic cladding, used during the building boom of the 1990s and early 2000s, has been linked with higher rates of leakage, leading to wood rot, toxic mould and structural integrity issues.

..........

作者: ry55 时间: 2017-1-7 21:55:46

恩，，那有机会捡漏么。。。。

作者: NewLynnHse 时间: 2017-1-7 22:04:53

ry55 发表于 2017-1-7 21:55
恩，，那有机会捡漏么。。。。

会玩的可以啊，可惜多数上当的都是菜鸟

作者: 八宝菜 时间: 2017-1-7 23:31:30

大把builder在寻找好的do up,不懂不做

作者: NewLynnHse 时间: 2017-1-8 09:41:13

八宝菜发表于 2017-1-7 23:31
大把builder在寻找好的do up,不懂不做

这些Builder在未来的50年里都有活忙咯，40多万套房子啊。。。哈哈

作者: skyjustin 时间: 2017-1-8 11:31:18

这个小区是不是结构有大问题呀 recladding的费用从15万7直接涨到38万，38万都可以重新起个house了吧

作者: clam 时间: 2017-1-8 15:49:53

買leaky的房子最忌買這種小區，買有地的或crosslease 的reclad不用那麼貴。
apartment 或有BC的單是admin cost 都可能佔reclad 費用的1/3了...

builder 買也不會買有bc的，根本不能自己修!

作者: seakiwi 时间: 2017-1-8 16:21:05

怎么这种房子（还是新房)也漏啊 ?!!

21世纪了，还他妈的不会盖房子啊？？？！！！艹

作者: 母猪也可以上树 时间: 2017-1-8 16:42:46

seakiwi 发表于 2017-1-8 16:21
怎么这种房子（还是新房)也漏啊 ?!!

21世纪了，还他妈的不会盖房子啊？？？！！！艹 ...

可不是么，连房子都不悔盖。

作者: NewLynnHse 时间: 2017-1-8 17:49:13

seakiwi 发表于 2017-1-8 16:21
怎么这种房子（还是新房)也漏啊 ?!!

21世纪了，还他妈的不会盖房子啊？？？！！！艹 ...

你别说，我就看准了未来30年要盖的那40多万套新房还是会有很多豆腐渣

作者: 八宝菜 时间: 2017-1-8 17:57:26

NewLynnHse 发表于 2017-1-8 08:41
这些Builder在未来的50年里都有活忙咯，40多万套房子啊。。。哈哈

是这个节奏。

欢迎光临新西兰天维网社区 (http://bbs.skykiwi.com/)