新西兰天维网社区

标题: 号外: 司法部长步了Pansy的后尘? [打印本页]

作者: dc.    时间: 2014-3-4 18:09:23     标题: 号外: 司法部长步了Pansy的后尘?

本帖最后由 dc. 于 2014-3-9 12:23 编辑

Justice Minister Judith Collins visiting a company in China that her husband is a director of. ... Tuesday, 04 March 2014, 6:30pm ... the upcoming royal tour is "tremendous value for money", .....
https://www.google.co.nz/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&ved=0CD4QFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scoop.co.nz%2Fmultimedia%2Ftv%2Fnational%2F89789.html&ei=12wVU_bUNIWZlAXs_4HoDw&usg=AFQjCNEcBjlzEEdq31Esr6P7yKLuYXd4Zw

求高人点评爆料....
作者: dc.    时间: 2014-3-4 18:13:37

JUSTICE  MINISTER BREACHED THE JUSTICE RULES?
作者: dc.    时间: 2014-3-4 20:17:28

大家都禁声了?
作者: dc.    时间: 2014-3-5 14:48:04

本帖最后由 dc. 于 2014-3-5 15:49 编辑

CCTV8的新闻今日谈今天下午说了: 国家党的女司法部长兼民族事务部长并兼ACC主管的Judith Collins, 不避嫌去她老公挂名顾问的中国公司站台, 公私不分并公然违犯应该利益迥避的新西兰的内阁规章, 如此以身试法比从前的Pancy违法更厉害.
作者: oplwy    时间: 2014-3-5 14:52:20

啥  没看呢~~
作者: bintoo    时间: 2014-3-5 14:55:52

早上听洋人电台评论了, 他们说这事件没有Pancy那个严重.
作者: songinator    时间: 2014-3-5 14:56:57

dc. 发表于 2014-3-5 14:48
CCTV8的新闻今日谈今天下午说了: 国家党的女司法部长兼民族事务部长并兼ACC主管的Judith Collins, 不避嫌去 ...

ctv8吧,。
作者: dc.    时间: 2014-3-5 15:04:06

bintoo 发表于 2014-3-5 15:55
早上听洋人电台评论了, 他们说这事件没有Pancy那个严重.

那是国家党的喉舌电台吧?
作者: dc.    时间: 2014-3-5 15:05:38

songinator 发表于 2014-3-5 15:56
ctv8吧,。

都快成了央视海外版了.
作者: songinator    时间: 2014-3-5 15:13:30

dc. 发表于 2014-3-5 15:05
都快成了央视海外版了.

呵呵 转播省事儿啊
作者: dc.    时间: 2014-3-5 15:14:39

songinator 发表于 2014-3-5 16:13
呵呵 转播省事儿啊

很乏味, 还好有些风凰台的节目.
作者: bintoo    时间: 2014-3-5 15:33:18

dc. 发表于 2014-3-5 16:04
那是国家党的喉舌电台吧?

RadioLIVE   我也不清楚, 一直听下来主持人是支持国家党的, 正常政治取向而已, 不可以说人家是什么喉舌吧
作者: dc.    时间: 2014-3-5 19:27:20

bintoo 发表于 2014-3-5 16:33
RadioLIVE   我也不清楚, 一直听下来主持人是支持国家党的, 正常政治取向而已, 不可以说人家是什么喉舌 ...

和key的口调一致, 至少是个宣传机器.
作者: dc.    时间: 2014-3-6 14:18:31

本帖最后由 dc. 于 2014-3-6 15:26 编辑

公务人员不避亲即使在贪腐闻名的俄国将来都行不通, 一个司法部长不但不完善新西兰的公务人员法规还以身试法当坏榜样秀下限, 自诩是清廉国家是个笑话吧.
作者: dc.    时间: 2014-3-6 14:24:11

你们装蒜民众却不信服你们,  自失民心?
作者: dc.    时间: 2014-3-6 14:30:03

要她发誓保证她没利益输送冲突她敢吗?
作者: dc.    时间: 2014-3-7 09:05:06

Editorial: Minister's actions in China naive and careless5:30 AM Friday Mar 7, 2014Add a comment


Ms Collins is naive if she believes the actions and comments of a Cabinet minister will not be used by the company to promote its products. Photo / Michael Craig

Judith Collins has brusquely rejected claims that visiting her husband's dairy company in China represented a conflict of interest. She had simply been assisting New Zealand Inc, as ministers were expected to do whenever they were overseas, she said. The Prime Minister lent support, saying the Cabinet Office had stated unequivocally that there had been no breach of Cabinet Manual rules. On that count, it may appear nothing untoward had occurred. If only it were so simple.

At best, the Justice Minister's actions during a visit to the offices of Oravida, a New Zealand company that exports milk products to China, were naive, careless and unwise. A translation of a Chinese-language report on the company's website says she tried Oravida's milk and "praised" it. Tackling this arena, the Cabinet Manual says: "No minister should endorse, in any media, any product or service."

According to the Cabinet Office, however, Ms Collins' comment does not mean she endorsed Oravida's product.


Such incidents happened all the time, added the Prime Minister. "I go to a lot of things where I say I use your toilet paper, or whatever it might be, that's not deemed to be an endorsement."

Maybe so, but Ms Collins was naive if she believed the actions and comments of a Cabinet minister would not be used by the company to promote its products. Worse, this was not just any company. Ms Collins' husband, David Wong Tung, is a director, and Oravida donated more than $55,000 to the National Party in 2011. A cash cow.



A minister's role is a public one, and "appearances and propriety can be as important as an actual conflict of interest". In that context, Ms Collins' visit to Oravida smacks of carelessness.




The lack of wisdom implicit in her visit is underlined by other parts of the Cabinet Manual. It notes that public perception is very important. Ministers, it says, are responsible for ensuring no conflict of interest exists or appears to exist between their personal interests and their public duty. A minister's role is a public one, and "appearances and propriety can be as important as an actual conflict of interest". In that context, Ms Collins' visit to Oravida smacks of carelessness.

It is the more so given the fate in this Government's time of other ministers who demonstrated a similarly blase attitude. In 2009, Internal Affairs Minister Richard Worth received a "bollocking" from the Prime Minister for promoting an aviation company in which he had an interest during a private visit to India. Only a year later, another Cabinet minister, Pansy Wong, also paid a price for blurring the boundaries. While in China, she witnessed a deal her husband helped to arrange between a Rotorua hovercraft firm and a Chinese investor, signing herself as a Government minister. Eventually, after strong criticism, she resigned her portfolios for a lesser misjudgment - the misuse of an overseas air travel perk.

When dealing with Dr Worth, John Key said he expected ministers to work out potential conflicts of interest themselves. The Cabinet Manual makes the same point. But Ms Collins' only concession has been to ask Oravida to remove any references to her visit that breached the manual. If that request carries its own admission, she has been, otherwise, utterly unapologetic. Typical of her attitude was the comment, "I drink milk, shock horror I drink milk".

This country has a culture of honesty in public life. It should not be taken for granted, however. Cabinet ministers play an important part in upholding that culture. Indeed, they should endorse it at every opportunity. Ms Collins' unwillingness to acknowledge even that her action could be perceived as inappropriate hardly does that. The public simply has to ask the obvious question: Would she have gone out of her way to visit and talk up any other Kiwi exporter of dairy products while she was on unrelated ministerial business in China? Unlikely.

- NZ Herald


作者: 直面异议    时间: 2014-3-8 07:36:52

根本就是两个事。pency 当时最大的问题是签署那个协议。
作者: dc.    时间: 2014-3-8 07:42:12

直面异议 发表于 2014-3-8 08:36
根本就是两个事。pency 当时最大的问题是签署那个协议。

她老公当了ORAVIDA公司的总裁和顾问, 国家党党主席也是那家公司的供应商, 可见是一丘之貉.
作者: 直面异议    时间: 2014-3-8 08:30:53

dc. 发表于 2014-3-8 07:42
她老公当了ORAVIDA公司的总裁和顾问, 国家党党主席也是那家公司的供应商, 可见是一丘之貉.

那更是另外的事。当时黄议员就不该在书面材料上出现自己的名字和头衔。
作者: dc.    时间: 2014-3-8 14:46:59

直面异议 发表于 2014-3-8 09:30
那更是另外的事。当时黄议员就不该在书面材料上出现自己的名字和头衔。

这帖不是用来谈pancy, 别偏了, tks.
作者: 知不知道我是谁    时间: 2014-3-9 10:10:43

Pansy吧,不是Pancy
作者: dc.    时间: 2014-3-9 11:21:02

知不知道我是谁 发表于 2014-3-9 11:10
Pansy吧,不是Pancy

哦............




欢迎光临 新西兰天维网社区 (http://bbs.skykiwi.com/) Powered by Discuz! X2