新西兰天维网社区

标题: milford 连体两房再创新高 [打印本页]

作者: 和我联系有事 时间: 2014-2-13 19:10:35 标题: milford 连体两房再创新高

本帖最后由和我联系有事于 2014-2-13 19:11 编辑

今天拍卖成交87万，什么情况
http://www.trademe.co.nz/property/residential-property-for-sale/auction-687918934.htm

作者: Venox10111 时间: 2014-2-13 19:12:47

本帖最后由 Venox10111 于 2014-2-13 20:13 编辑

房子挺好，室内面积不小，又是好区，不奇怪吧，Crosslease 1/2sh 829m2

作者: onetreehill1 时间: 2014-2-13 19:43:41

wow, 2房的Unit上到了87W，不过好区和新装修是卖点

作者: 和我联系有事 时间: 2014-2-13 19:46:25

onetreehill1 发表于 2014-2-13 19:43
wow, 2房的Unit上到了87W，不过好区和新装修是卖点

而且是连体的，不过是车库连

作者: NewLynnHse 时间: 2014-2-13 20:01:30

这个真的是unit title吗？

作者: Venox10111 时间: 2014-2-13 20:03:40

NewLynnHse 发表于 2014-2-13 21:01
这个真的是unit title吗？

Crosslease 啊。。。地也不小

作者: kingscat 时间: 2014-2-13 20:05:39

真是是屎难尿啊

作者: NewLynnHse 时间: 2014-2-13 20:08:45

Venox10111 发表于 2014-2-13 21:03
Crosslease 啊。。。地也不小

那，那个卖家可以投诉中介的listing写错，房子卖不到好价钱了

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/proper ... p;objectid=11200865

Real estate agent fined over low listing price

A central Auckland real estate agent who listed a $1 million house for tens of thousands less than the sale price has been censured and fined $1000.

Harcourts Mt Eden and Epsom agent Mike Emery has been found to have engaged in unsatisfactory conduct while he and another agent were tasked with selling the property by auction at the end of 2012.

The seller complained to the Real Estate Agents Authority (REAA) that the property was listed on the Harcourts website in the wrong price bracket, without proper disclosure and transparency.

The property was advertised in the $700,000 to $800,000 bracket when it should have been listed in the $850,000 to $950,000 bracket.

The complainant claimed that affected bids on the property, which did not reach reserve at auction. The property later sold through a different agency for $993,000.
.....

作者: Venox10111 时间: 2014-2-13 20:19:39

NewLynnHse 发表于 2014-2-13 21:08
那，那个卖家可以投诉中介的listing写错，房子卖不到好价钱了

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/property/ne ...

但联体的，也能算unit...虽然个人感觉更像Townhouse

作者: NewLynnHse 时间: 2014-2-13 20:20:55

Venox10111 发表于 2014-2-13 21:19
但联体的，也能算unit...虽然个人感觉更像Townhouse

title不知道是不是unit

作者: 田蔚RayWhite 时间: 2014-2-13 20:42:05

应该是UNITE TITLE
   25 NILE ROAD MILFORD NORTH SHORE
Valuation Reference:    2754/7700A
Legal Description:    1/2SH LOT 23 DP 20322-F/1 DP 72975
Tenure:    Not Applicable or Extension
Floor Area:    110 m2
Land Area:    0 m2
Bedrooms: 2
Building Age:    1970 - 1979
Category:    Residential, OYO, average (RF)
Wall Material:    Brick / GOOD
Roof Material:    Tile Profile / GOOD
Contour:    Level
Deck:    N
Parking Freestanding:    1 car
Parking Main Roof:    0
Land Use:    Multi-unit
Zoning:    9H

作者: nzz 时间: 2014-2-13 21:46:55

本帖最后由 nzz 于 2014-2-13 22:55 编辑

好贵啊.........

作者: Venox10111 时间: 2014-2-13 22:09:59

田蔚RayWhite 发表于 2014-2-13 21:42
应该是UNITE TITLE
25 NILE ROAD MILFORD NORTH SHORE
Valuation Reference: 2754/7700A

Flat 2 DP 72975 on Lot 23 DP 20322 1/2sh 829m2
这不是Unit Title, 是 Crosslease Townhouse (或许因为2房就归类于Unit, 但这Share 的land还真挺大的）

真正的Unit Title 是UNIT X DP XXXX

做中介的要多学习学习啊。。。

作者: rabit 时间: 2014-2-13 22:26:15

房间内部挺漂亮，面积也大..但是两房连体卖87万也太离谱了吧？？？？

作者: bigwater 时间: 2014-2-13 22:55:29

Venox10111 发表于 2014-2-13 23:09
Flat 2 DP 72975 on Lot 23 DP 20322 1/2sh 829m2
这不是Unit Title, 是 Crosslease Townhouse (或许因为 ...

别说的人家无法混饭了。

作者: Venox10111 时间: 2014-2-13 22:57:24

本帖最后由 Venox10111 于 2014-2-13 23:57 编辑

bigwater 发表于 2014-2-13 23:55
别说的人家无法混饭了。

做中介不能乱说话，不然随时REAA.... 不像我这种草鸟，随便说，经常被喷，哈哈

作者: womb 时间: 2014-2-14 08:22:09

so expensive ar!

作者: NewLynnHse 时间: 2014-2-14 08:28:45

田蔚RayWhite 发表于 2014-2-13 21:42
应该是UNITE TITLE
25 NILE ROAD MILFORD NORTH SHORE
Valuation Reference: 2754/7700A

请问这个是怎么看出来是unit title的？

作者: bungyjumping999 时间: 2014-2-14 08:35:22

it is cross leased. not unit title. She needs more training and supervision.

作者: 游客 时间: 2014-2-14 10:10:21

NewLynnHse 发表于 2014-2-13 20:20
title不知道是不是unit

Milford有很多联体的unit都是crosslease title.

像这些,你去查title,我肯定十有八九都是crosslease的.
http://www.trademe.co.nz/propert ... ction-691821828.htm
http://www.trademe.co.nz/propert ... ction-685369089.htm
http://www.trademe.co.nz/propert ... ction-695763192.htm
http://www.trademe.co.nz/propert ... ction-679957035.htm

作者: wyan041 时间: 2014-2-14 10:28:04

提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: 游客 时间: 2014-2-14 10:37:46

NewLynnHse 发表于 2014-2-13 20:08
那，那个卖家可以投诉中介的listing写错，房子卖不到好价钱了

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/property/ne ...

刚才无聊,查了一下我上面发的4个listing,第一个是unit title,后面三个都是crosslease的.但一般中介都会在广告上写unit,因为这种样子的房子其实就是unit

作者: NewLynnHse 时间: 2014-2-14 10:41:14

游客发表于 2014-2-14 11:37
刚才无聊,查了一下我上面发的4个listing,第一个是unit title,后面三个都是crosslease的.但一般中介都会在 ...

也可以啦，反正大家开心就好，不开心就告

作者: 游客 时间: 2014-2-14 10:44:47

NewLynnHse 发表于 2014-2-14 10:41
也可以啦，反正大家开心就好，不开心就告

这个应该没关系的吧,有的人还就是喜欢unit title,不要cross lease title呢. 但一般看房的时候,中介都会说清楚是unit 还是 crosslease .

不然另外那个贴子里的那个glenfield passed in 的unit的华人中介就惨了,他那个也是cross lease title

作者: SilverFern 时间: 2014-2-14 10:45:40

在讨论 Stratum in Freehold 和 cross lease的区别吗？ google了一下

Why are there two systems?

Cross-leasing was designed in the early 1960s to provide a simple means of obtaining separate titles for more than one dwelling on the same piece of land.

The unit title (also referred to as strata title) was designed to provide separate titles for buildings on different levels, i.e. for multi-story buildings. Although intended for multi-level units, the unit title is, however, also used for single level developments by choice.

按照我的理解 stratum in freehold是标准的公寓或者unit title，对于多层unit必须用stratum in freehold, 而单层unit就可以用cross lease，事实上多数的单层unit也是cross lease title. 在land use这里写到 multi unit, 如果是crosslease townhouse，这里应该写 Single Unit Excluding Bach，所以这个房子确实是unit无疑。

作者: 田蔚RayWhite 时间: 2014-2-14 14:49:03

田蔚RayWhite 发表于 2014-2-13 20:42
应该是UNITE TITLE
25 NILE ROAD MILFORD NORTH SHORE
Valuation Reference: 2754/7700A

land use Multi-unit .。。具体以TITLE 为准。如果是UNITE title放CROSS LEASE 中介才有大麻烦。一般是不会出现这种情况的。卖家的律师都会检查过拍卖文件以后才正式发给买家。如果文件出错，买家是可以告的。一切都很透明。

作者: 田蔚RayWhite 时间: 2014-2-14 14:53:32

Venox10111 发表于 2014-2-13 22:57
做中介不能乱说话，不然随时REAA.... 不像我这种草鸟，随便说，经常被喷，哈哈

land use Multi-unit .。。具体以TITLE 为准。如果是UNITE title放CROSS LEASE 中介也会有大麻烦。一般是不会出现这种情况的。中介会查TITLE, 一切以TITLE 为准。同时，卖家的律师都会检查过拍卖文件以后才正式发给买家。如果文件出错，买家是可以告的。一切都很透明。

作者: Venox10111 时间: 2014-2-14 15:01:42

田蔚RayWhite 发表于 2014-2-14 15:53
land use Multi-unit .。。具体以TITLE 为准。如果是UNITE title放CROSS LEASE 中介也会有大麻烦。一 ...

恩，恩，那就是按照Land use 来看，确实是Multiunit 了

作者: bungyjumping999 时间: 2014-2-14 15:16:27

本帖最后由 bungyjumping999 于 2014-2-14 15:21 编辑

if it is unit , it should have body corp, does not matter if it is 2 units in a row... it is control under unit titles act.

I have seen a row of flat ( 7 houses) on exmount road, northcote, on the face of it, it looks like unit , but is cross leased to each other.

problems : as it is not unit, no body corp, no management on the site is formed to cut grass on common area, the area is not consistent and looks a bit messy. some common areas are not maintained as it is no body business.

作者: 和我联系有事 时间: 2014-2-14 15:22:16

Venox10111 发表于 2014-2-13 22:09
Flat 2 DP 72975 on Lot 23 DP 20322 1/2sh 829m2
这不是Unit Title, 是 Crosslease Townhouse (或许因为 ...

大家好像越说越远了，这个连体房无聊是什么title 这个价钱反映了什么情况

作者: 田蔚RayWhite 时间: 2014-2-14 15:26:13

和我联系有事发表于 2014-2-14 15:22
大家好像越说越远了，这个连体房无聊是什么title 这个价钱反映了什么情况

哈哈，这个价格反映现在房子真贵！

作者: bungyjumping999 时间: 2014-2-14 15:27:58

本帖最后由 bungyjumping999 于 2014-2-14 15:37 编辑

Renovation costs could be around $100k - 150k for this hse. as agent put it " no stone unturned "

rear house enjoy the garden at the back.

$850k - $870k is about right for this hse

作者: 观。火 时间: 2014-2-14 15:38:47

LAND USE 各位去用GIS VIEWER 看看去，CROSSLEASE 和HOME AND INCOME 等等包括这个连体房的LAND USE 都写的是：MUITI UNITS,FLATS.

中介不专业这个倒是太正常太普遍啦

作者: bungyjumping999 时间: 2014-2-14 15:43:35

本帖最后由 bungyjumping999 于 2014-2-14 15:45 编辑

观。火发表于 2014-2-14 15:38
LAND USE 各位去用GIS VIEWER 看看去，CROSSLEASE 和HOME AND INCOME 等等包括这个连体房的LAND USE 都写的 ...

multi units / multi flats on land use does not mean it is unit title....

if it is unit title, it should be governed under unit titles act and with body corp.

multi unit name is used loosely......

作者: 观。火 时间: 2014-2-14 15:46:34

bungyjumping999 发表于 2014-2-14 15:43
multi units / multi flats does not mean it is unit title....

if it is unit title, it should be ...

是这意思，所以不能看有UNITS的字眼就望文生义。

欢迎光临新西兰天维网社区 (http://bbs.skykiwi.com/)