新西兰天维网社区

标题: 邻居在件新房子。当了阳光怎么办。（已经回答） [打印本页]

作者: miaowei 时间: 2013-10-18 12:06:07 标题: 邻居在件新房子。当了阳光怎么办。（已经回答）

本帖最后由 AMICUS_LAW 于 2013-10-21 15:06 编辑

你好。我的邻居把家里的游泳池的那块地分割出来建房子。。本来我们房子的地势就地。。他在上面要建一个2层的房子。围栏已经和我们的屋顶一样高了。。那房子加好了岂不是要高出5米多了。正好档上了西面的阳光。。有打电话给康嫂。他们说管不了这个。已经都批准建房子了。。请问律师我们现在还有什么办法吗。当时分割的时候他们家没有下水。。需要从我们的院子里面接管道。。当时他们有过来让我们帮忙签字。。我们是5家在一块大地上。所以要5家房东都要签字。。当时只有3家房东在。都有签字。另外两家是房客代签的。。想知道这个有法律依据吗。。谢谢

作者: joyjoyjoy 时间: 2013-10-18 12:12:31

档阳光康嫂好像要管的吧。。。。再打个电话咨询一下。

作者: miaowei 时间: 2013-10-18 12:25:32

joyjoyjoy 发表于 2013-10-18 13:12
档阳光康嫂好像要管的吧。。。。再打个电话咨询一下。

打了两遍了。。里面有个JO 的女的说。她们做不了什么了。。现在她们的手续都办好了。。房子的规划图也好了。。要我找律师去。。西区的康嫂

作者: ROYO 时间: 2013-10-18 12:47:34

接管道的时候你签字同意了吗？

作者: miaowei 时间: 2013-10-18 12:51:29

ROYO 发表于 2013-10-18 13:47
接管道的时候你签字同意了吗？

同意了，，，，，，，，，，，，，，，，，

作者: oplwy 时间: 2013-10-18 12:52:48

我听说当时你要是签字同意了那事后就不好改了

作者: 无过 时间: 2013-10-18 14:04:09

有几个事情. 太阳高度角这个事是一定要测量的，也就是他家房子的最高点到你们的围栏必须是有一个角度限制，你要看看这个是否超过了...然后就是你们签字的那个东西你们仔细看过么？到底是只说了管道还是说了所有的东西都同意. council其实很懒的，已经批准的building consent 很难再改变，除非有证据他们的建筑不符合建筑要求

作者: future123 时间: 2013-10-18 14:42:41

miaowei 发表于 2013-10-18 12:51
同意了，，，，，，，，，，，，，，，，，

同意了,只要对你的起它方面有影响,你还可以叫他改的,继续打电话给council

作者: 吃草的狮子 时间: 2013-10-21 02:36:51

理论上他们所有的报批都是合法的并且得到市政局同意的，在这种情况下还档的话，你啥也做不了

作者: AMICUS_LAW 时间: 2013-10-21 14:06:03

下面的案例所说的是关于树木遮挡景色的，和邻居房屋遮挡阳光有类似的效果，基本上，法律对批准的建筑许可很难推翻，只能通过interference with enjoyment of land 这类common law 法律制约。但是，要通过法庭让common law 大过resource management act 的难度是很大的。

Houses are often built in ways that take advantage of the property’s view.  It can be distressing when that view becomes blocked by your neighbours’ trees.  You may wonder what you can do about it, given that the trees do not belong to you.  Rest assured that the law can provide some relief.

The law on removing trees blocking your view
The Property Law Act provides a remedy for people adversely affected by trees on neighbouring properties to obtain a Court order for their removal.  The Court has discretion as to whether it will make the order, but can require the owner of land upon which trees are located to trim or remove the trees if they unduly obstruct the views enjoyed by a neighbouring property.

The Court’s discretion is not as wide as it may appear; there are some restrictions on the Court’s power.  The Court’s discretion to make an order for removal of trees is to be exercised cautiously.  The Court may only make an order if it is permitted to do so after having regard to all the relevant circumstances.  The Court must consider whether the order to remove trees is fair, reasonable and necessary to prevent an undue obstruction of the view that would otherwise be enjoyed from your land, and whether a refusal to make the order would cause hardship to you, that is greater than the hardship that would be caused to your neighbours.

The restrictions on the exercise of the Court’s discretion do not end there.  In determining whether to make an order, the Court must also take into account:
• Whether the trees complained of were already there when you purchased the land;
• The interests of the public in the maintenance of an aesthetically pleasing environment;
• The desirability of protecting public reserves containing trees;
• The value of the tree as a public amenity;
• Any historical, cultural, or scientific significant of the tree.

After considering all these things, an order may be made if, in all the circumstances, “the Court thinks fit”.

欢迎光临新西兰天维网社区 (http://bbs.skykiwi.com/)