新西兰天维网社区

标题: 在线等问：关于不小心卖酒给未成年人（已经回答） [打印本页]

作者: 白牛 时间: 2012-4-4 23:57:38 标题: 在线等问：关于不小心卖酒给未成年人（已经回答）

本帖最后由 AMICUS_LAW 于 2012-4-5 11:18 编辑

去年4月找了一个在酒铺的工作，老板让我边做边考酒牌。

去年5月警察钓鱼执法派一个未成年人来买酒当时店里很多人我又要卖酒还要看客人（店里已经被偷过两次了），所以没注意这个人。说实话洋人的面孔有些看着很老成但是年龄不够。反正就卖了，之后警察马上就上门了。我也解释了，他说会把我说的话记录下来然后交给法院决定。

去年7月我就去考了酒牌但是惠灵顿那个LLA 一直不给我牌照，说警察局对我的指控还没有结束。因为当时我卖酒给未成年人的时候，我没有酒牌，而且持牌人在店里。所以court做出关店一天，持牌人停牌一个月的处罚，但是对我没有处罚，我也没有收到任何的罚单。我觉得这个事儿就算过去了，毕竟也是第一次。

但是我的酒牌一直不下来，直到今年2月我反复打电话去LLA催他才在albert st上的法院安排一个hearing在四月底。我前几天跑去法院问这个hearing到底是干什么的？我在上面要说什么做什么？哪一方都会参加？比如LLA会派人吗？警察局会派人吗？我要陈述些什么？前台的人都表示不知道...... 我晕在上到6楼去问，他们也不知道。

我现在有点懵：卖酒给未成年人的事儿算是结束了吗？这个hearing到底要我做什么？

作者: sandy512 时间: 2012-4-9 08:31:36

你没有被起诉,hearing 是由本地法官和LLA派来的2个人组成一个审议的团体,然后听听council的酒牌官和警察方面的officer为什么不给你发酒牌,同时你也可以申诉你觉得你可以被发酒牌的理由, 最后由法官的lla那两个人组成的团体根据双方的陈述做出裁决是否发酒牌给你. 如果你对hearing的结果不满意,你可以上诉去高等法院,由高等法院开庭再次审理. 建议如果你真的很在乎你的酒牌的话,找个律师去帮你出席hearing,一定要是barrister,不是一般的lawyer或者solicitor之类的小律师,因为很多律师根本没有什么概念什么是Liquor Licensing Authority Hearing,你到这个网站就知道我说的才是正确的http://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/liquor-licensing-authority

作者: AMICUS_LAW 时间: 2012-4-12 03:03:47

本帖最后由 AMICUS_LAW 于 2012-4-12 02:08 编辑

您好，LS 所说没有错，当时看您的问题有点快，直接把LLA hearing 看漏了，以为是summary offence charge based on S155 Breach of the Sale of Liquor Act 1989, 而忽略了LLA hearing. 一个是刑事罪，另一个是你自己的酒牌申请application. 不过您还是需要确定一下法庭是否有起诉你关于卖liquor 给未成年的罪名。

如果您需要安排帮助出席hearing 辩论是否可以获得酒牌的话，建议和我们直接联系吧。（我们事务所是LS所说的barristers,专职诉讼律师，有能力代理您案件的）

155 Sale or supply of liquor to minors

(1) Every person commits an offence and is liable to the penalty set out in subsection (2A) who, being the licensee or a manager of any licensed premises, sells or supplies any liquor, or allows any liquor to be sold or supplied, on or from the licensed premises to any person who is under the age of 18 years.

(2) Every person commits an offence and is liable to the penalty set out in subsection (2A) who, not being the licensee or a manager of any licensed premises, sells or supplies any liquor, on or from the licensed premises to any person who is under the age of 18 years.

(2A) The penalty is,—

(a) in the case of a licensee,—

(i) a fine not exceeding $10,000; or

(ii) the suspension of the licensee's licence for a period not exceeding 7 days; or

(iii) both:

(b) in the case of a manager, a fine not exceeding $10,000:

(c) in the case of a person (not being a licensee or manager), a fine not exceeding $2,000.

(3) Subsection (2) applies irrespective of any liability that may attach to the licensee or any manager in respect of the same offence.

(4) It is a defence to a charge under subsection (1) or subsection (2) if the defendant proves that the person who sold or supplied the liquor believed on reasonable grounds that the person to whom it was sold or supplied had attained the age of 18 years.

(4A) Without limiting subsection (4), reasonable grounds exist for the purposes of that subsection if the defendant proves that the person who sold or supplied the liquor had, before or at the time of sale or supply, sighted an evidence of age document of the person whose age is material to the offence, indicating that that person was of or over the age of 18 years.

(5) No person shall be guilty of an offence against subsection (1) or subsection (2) by selling or supplying liquor to any person who then supplies it to another person who is under the age of 18 years, unless it is proved that the

欢迎光临新西兰天维网社区 (http://bbs.skykiwi.com/)