新西兰天维网社区

标题: 刚见到的惨烈车祸。图。觉得suv安全的更要进来看看。 [打印本页]

作者: netghost1861 时间: 2011-7-4 20:00:06 标题: 刚见到的惨烈车祸。图。觉得suv安全的更要进来看看。

本帖最后由 netghost1861 于 2011-7-4 19:02 编辑

下午4点半在东区Dannemora见到的车祸，救护车还没来，那人看来伤势严重，倒地不起。

车子是一个Rav4 翻了，但周围没有见到另一个事故车，不会那么快就拖走了吧？我估计不是撞车，而是翻车。估计车祸才发生十分钟吧。

作者: 泡沫舞步 时间: 2011-7-4 20:10:21

rav4经常翻车以前很多人翻各种翻开车一定要慢呀

作者: Esipan 时间: 2011-7-4 20:12:48

suv安不安全也要跟价钱做对比的，这要是换成knight,我估计躺地上的是另一个事故车。

作者: 夜螺丝 时间: 2011-7-4 20:35:34

在发生碰撞时谁的质量大谁占优势

作者: vassell 时间: 2011-7-4 20:50:31

rav4这种入门级的suv也就这样了

作者: kiwilo99 时间: 2011-7-4 20:51:11

舊款rav4....
高的車子急速轉彎然後翻車??

作者: 名字似乎很重要 时间: 2011-7-4 20:55:40

舊款rav4....
高的車子急速轉彎然後翻車??
kiwilo99 发表于 2011-7-4 19:51

俺也这么认为。

作者: hf0408 时间: 2011-7-4 21:09:46

这N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

作者: vassell 时间: 2011-7-4 21:16:25

之前也见过有SUV刚刚从高速下来可能没及时收油，拐个弯结果翻了

作者: chang824 时间: 2011-7-4 21:40:09

rav4 是小型的SUV.....不能拿那個跟普通的SUV 比撒

作者: masterq 时间: 2011-7-4 22:00:24

關鍵是看人，駕駛態度不正确裝甲車也不安全~~

作者: k-one 时间: 2011-7-4 22:00:50

这应该是一辆两门的RAV4~~~~~~车身高轴距短

作者: Alan9a 时间: 2011-7-4 22:10:49

RAV4不能算是SUV,尤其是两门的
只能算是COMPACT RECREATIONAL VEHICLE(CRV)

作者: masterq 时间: 2011-7-4 22:20:26

07年之后的RAV4并不是嚴格意義上的四驅，車速超過六十公里会自动变成两驅。

作者: salasun 时间: 2011-7-4 22:25:05

提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: oldid 时间: 2011-7-4 22:39:19

提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: beck@ 时间: 2011-7-4 23:15:44

關鍵是看人，駕駛態度不正确裝甲車也不安全~~
masterq 发表于 2011-7-4 21:00

同意！！！！！！！！！

作者: jacksonzhou_25 时间: 2011-7-4 23:23:26

我唯一听说过的一个朋友翻车就是rav4在高速上，其实弯不是很急，鬼使神差的就失控了，还好伤的都不厉害，没什么后遗症

作者: 圆咕咙咚 时间: 2011-7-4 23:25:51

關鍵是看人，駕駛態度不正确裝甲車也不安全~~

masterq 发表于 2011-7-4 21:00

人家都是四轮，你整个八轮……没准中间还藏俩…………

作者: masterq 时间: 2011-7-4 23:30:59

人家都是四轮，你整个八轮……没准中间还藏俩…………
圆咕咙咚发表于 2011-7-4 22:25

作者: xyz1234 时间: 2011-7-4 23:33:13

我擦，看来伤的很严重啊

作者: masterq 时间: 2011-7-4 23:35:08

我唯一听说过的一个朋友翻车就是rav4在高速上，其实弯不是很急，鬼使神差的就失控了，还好伤的都不厉害，没什么后遗症
jacksonzhou_25 发表于 2011-7-4 22:23

真的嗎？你不要吓我喔~~

作者: oldid 时间: 2011-7-4 23:37:53

提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: Calvin_Chan 时间: 2011-7-5 11:49:29

真的嗎？你不要吓我喔~~

masterq 发表于 2011-7-4 22:35

新款的没那么容易啦～毕竟宽了不少～没高很多～

作者: ZJC-NZ 时间: 2011-7-5 11:59:50

希望人都没事。小心驾驶啊

作者: knight_terry 时间: 2011-7-5 13:32:27

{:8_383:}..........................

作者: huxilin 时间: 2011-7-5 13:43:26

开车注意点就是了。。不过suv坐起来是很舒服的

作者: lebron 时间: 2011-7-5 14:27:27

RAV4很恐怖。。。特别2门的太容易歪了

作者: miyamina 时间: 2011-7-5 18:44:44

提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: 爱国爱港 时间: 2011-7-6 00:00:58

本帖最后由爱国爱港于 2011-7-5 23:02 编辑

http://www.dogandlemon.com/artic ... wheel-drives-safety

Four-wheel Drives & Safety

One of the great road safety myths is that four-wheel drives are safer. It’s simply not true.

Four-wheel drives tend to come out well in head-on collisions. However, in many other types of accidents, many popular four-wheel drive vehicles have higher rates of death or injury.

The American government does extensive research into road deaths and the vehicles involved in road deaths. They recently published a list of the thirteen safest vehicles and the fourteen most unsafe vehicles.

Of the list of thirteen safest vehicles, four were medium-sized four-wheel drives. Of the fourteen most unsafe vehicles, eight were four-wheel drives or large pickup trucks – the vehicles that you’d wrongly assume would be winners in road accidents.

The reason yuppie four-wheel drives seem more safe is because they tend to be large and heavy. Simple maths says that you’ll splatter most smaller cars in an accident. This feeling of invincibility makes yuppie four-wheel drives very attractive to bullies and people who need to feel strong and powerful. Thus their yuppie four-wheel drive becomes their own private castle and they often drive as if they own the road.

Four-wheel drive owners tend to forget that their castle-on-wheels does not corner as well as an ordinary family car. Further, because they are so high off the ground they tend to roll over if they have to make a very sudden turn. There is also anecdotal evidence that because four-wheel drive owners tend to feel more safe, they do not wear their seatbelts.

American studies have shown that yuppie four-wheel drives are most at risk in rollover crashes, which kill one in every four people in American car accidents. The study, a mathematical analysis of 189 year-2000 vehicles conducted for USA Today, concluded that some models turn over in nearly half of all incidents. The paper found that the first-generation Toyota RAV4 and the Suzuki Vitara (also sold as the Chevrolet/Geo Tracker) were likely to roll over in an accident 38 to 43.9% of the time. For most cars, the chance of a rollover in an accident is less than 10 percent.

Yuppie four-wheel drive owners rely heavily on their solidity & weight to make them winners in a head-on collision, but this same bulk can easily kill them.

As we said earlier, if a big four-wheel drive hits a smaller car, then the smaller car is history. Most people understand this. However, many accidents don’t involve a four-wheel drive hitting a smaller vehicle.

Crashtests in Australia have demonstrated beyond all reasonable doubt that when an older four-wheel drive has a head-on collision with something solid, the occupants of the four-wheel drive are in big trouble. This is because few four-wheel drives are designed to crumple properly in an accident.

Have you ever wondered how a stuntman can leap off a building and not get killed? It’s simple. He doesn’t hit the pavement below; instead he falls onto a large pile of cardboard grocery boxes. These boxes collapse as he hits, absorbing the energy of his fall. Often he will simply walk away totally unscathed. That’s how the crumple zones on a car work. The zone collapses like the stuntman’s cardboard boxes, absorbing much of the force from an accident and protecting the car’s occupants.

If an older four-wheel drive hits a lamppost, bank, bridge or truck, then the four-wheel drive does not crumple much. Therefore the people inside absorb the full force of the accident. It’s as simple as that.

Four-wheel drives are equally unsafe off the road. Offroad vehicles are marketed as a macho toy, and the results can be catastrophic. It’s bad enough with an experienced offroad driver, but put a city driver behind the wheel of a powerful offroad vehicle and you have the perfect setup for a serious accident.

As any farmer will tell you, gravel or mud are totally different to asphalt when it comes to driving. You have to know what you’re doing and take extreme care.

The idea that four-wheel drives never let you slip is nonsense, and on steep banks you can easily roll over and seriously damage yourself. At this point, cellphone or not, you may discover just how far from help you are.

作者: 優5566質 时间: 2011-7-6 00:15:30

默哀一下

不過可以開到翻車也滿神的...

作者: 爱国爱港 时间: 2011-7-6 00:17:34

默哀一下

不過可以開到翻車也滿神的...
優5566質发表于 2011-7-5 23:15

SUV重心高，高速拐弯是比房车容易翻。

作者: 恐龙蛋 时间: 2011-7-6 00:46:07

suv安全不安全
完全取决你怎么开

我就不信你开10km/h能把它开翻

各个车的性能不一样

你拿个drifting的车下沙滩我就不信它不陷

拿suv当跑车开当然不安全

作者: lynettez 时间: 2011-7-6 15:14:52

开过rav4~ 车身很轻~ 重心不稳~ 开起来和我的sx4差不多四驱只是一种fashion ~~~~ 不相信RAV~ 但是女生似乎喜欢

作者: 爱国爱港 时间: 2011-7-6 18:09:29

本帖最后由爱国爱港于 2011-7-6 17:11 编辑

开过rav4~ 车身很轻~ 重心不稳~ 开起来和我的sx4差不多四驱只是一种fashion ~~~~ 不相信RAV~ 但是女生似乎喜欢
lynettez 发表于 2011-7-6 14:14

因为很多女生根本不懂车，特别是不考虑车里面的机械设计，只是考虑车好不好看，单看车的外观来判断车好不好是很傻。

作者: 女性化挨罪 时间: 2011-7-6 21:11:39

35# 爱国爱港

文章引用的不错啊

dog lemon guide买车必看

弯多的路跟车跟suv总是很不爽，又慢，还高档我超车视线

作者: KOBE24 时间: 2011-7-6 23:20:41

同情啊，這樣翻車確實挺鬱悶的....

作者: 1075860 时间: 2011-7-7 01:07:11

驾驶时安全要注意，
开什么车都是如此，
没有不安全的车子，
只有不安全的司机。

作者: kiwilo99 时间: 2011-7-7 12:36:52

一切都是看D呀!!!

作者: superlady 时间: 2011-7-8 08:16:26

驾驶时安全要注意，
开什么车都是如此，
没有不安全的车子，
只有不安全的司机。
1075860 发表于 2011-7-7 00:07

作者: wingyi 时间: 2011-7-8 13:01:39

rav 4 不是suv吧？反正我不觉得是，比较是一个suv wanna be。。。

作者: aa9989 时间: 2011-7-10 15:52:29

速度多少翻啊，这种路也就开50吧，加上超速也就70不得了了吧，这样的速度也能翻？

作者: peterman9118 时间: 2011-7-19 23:58:18

大家開車要小心啊

欢迎光临新西兰天维网社区 (http://bbs.skykiwi.com/)