新西兰天维网社区

标题: 【测试数据】奥迪RS5 VS 宝马M3 VS CTS-V [打印本页]

作者: 巫妖王之怒    时间: 2010-8-25 03:40:58     标题: 【测试数据】奥迪RS5 VS 宝马M3 VS CTS-V

本帖最后由 巫妖王之怒 于 2010-8-25 03:51 编辑

1ST PLACE: BMW M3
The oldest car here, but like a good red wine, it's getting better with age. Driver-focused powertrain and chassis make it a scalpel among sledgehammers.

2ND PLACE: AUDI RS 5
Supremely confidence-inspiring and easy to drive fast, the RS 5 delivers a technical knockout, but at the price of driver involvement.

3RD PLACE: CADILLAC CTS-V COUPE
No shame here. Other than the subpar transmission, the Cadillac does an outstanding job of giving its German rivals a real run for the money.







Comparison: 2013 Audi RS 5 vs 2011 BMW M3 vs 2011 Cadillac CTS-V




2013 Audi RS 52011 BMW M32011 Cadillac CTS-V
POWERTRAIN/CHASSIS
DRIVETRAIN LAYOUTFront engine, AWDFront engine, RWDFront engine, RWD
ENGINE TYPE90-deg V-8, alum block/heads90-deg V-8, alum block/headsSupercharged 90-deg V-8, alum block/heads
VALVETRAINDOHC, 4 valves/cylDOHC, 4 valves/cylOHV, 2 valves/cyl
DISPLACEMENT254.1 cu in/4163 cc2244.0 cu in/3999 cc376.1 cu in/6162 cc
COMPRESSION RATIO12.3:112.0:19.1:1
POWER (SAE NET)444 hp @ 8250 rpm414 hp @ 8300 rpm556 hp @ 6100 rpm*
TORQUE (SAE NET)317 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm295 lb-ft @ 3900 rpm551 lb-ft @ 3800 rpm*
REDLINE8500 rpm8400 rpm6200 rpm
WEIGHT TO POWER9.0 lb/hp8.9 lb/hp7.7 lb/hp
TRANSMISSION7-speed twin-clutch auto7-speed twin-clutch auto6-speed automatic
AXLE/FINAL-DRIVE RATIOS4.38:1/2.70:13.15:1/3.15:13.23:1/2.16:1
SUSPENSION, FRONT; REARMultilink, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll barStruts, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll barControl arms, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar
STEERING RATIO13.3:112.5:116.1:1
TURNS LOCK-TO-LOCK2.82.82.7
BRAKES, F;R15.0-in vented, drilled carbon-ceramic disc; 12.8-in vented, drilled disc, ABS14.2-in vented disc;13.8-in vented disc, ABS15.0-in vented disc; 14.7-in vented disc, ABS
WHEELS9.0 x 20-in, cast alum9.0 x 19-in; 10.0 x 19-in, cast alum9.0 x 19-in; 9.5 x 19-in, forged alum
TIRES275/30R20 97Y Dunlop SP Sport Maxx GT R01245245/35R19 93Y; 265/35R19 98Y Continental ContiSportContact3255/40ZR19 96Y; 285/35ZR19 99Y Michelin Pilot Sport PS2
DIMENSIONS
WHEELBASE108.3 in108.7 in113.4 in
TRACK, F/R62.4/62.3 in60.6/60.6 in61.8/62.8 in
LENGTH X WIDTH X HEIGHT183.0 x 73.2 x 53.8 in181.8 x 71.0 x 55.8 in188.5 x 74.1 x 55.9 in
TURNING CIRCLE38.1 ft38.4 ft37.9 ft
CURB WEIGHT3975 lb3678 lb4254 lb
WEIGHT DIST, F/R58/42%51/49%54/46%
SEATING CAPACITY444
HEADROOM, F/R39.1/36.0 in38.4/36.8 in36.9/34.6 in
LEGROOM, F/R41.3/31.9 in41.8/33.7 in42.4/35.0 in
SHOULDER ROOM, F/R54.3/52.8 in55.3/51.9 in56.0/50.9 in
CARGO VOL, F/R12.0 cu ft11.0 cu ft10.5 cu ft
TEST DATA
ACCELERATION TO MPH
0-301.5 sec1.8 sec1.7 sec
0-402.32.42.3
0-503.23.13.1
0-604.34.14.0
0-705.65.15.1
0-807.16.56.3
0-908.88.17.5
0-10010.99.19.0
0-11013.311.410.8
0-12016.013.912.8
PASSING, 45-65 MPH2.2 sec1.9 sec1.8 sec
QUARTER MILE12.8 sec @ 108.2 mph12.6 sec @ 113.2 mph12.3 sec @ 117.7 mph
BRAKING, 60-0 MPH101 ft110 ft108 ft
BRAKING, 100-0 MPH295 ft309 ft293 ft
LATERAL ACCELERATION0.97 g (avg)0.95 g (avg)0.93 g (avg)
TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH2500 rpm2900 rpm1700 rpm
CONSUMER INFO
BASE PRICE$71,000 (est)$60,575$64,290
PRICE AS TESTED$78,500 (est)$68,705$69,785
STABILITY/TRACTION CONTROLYes/yesYes/yesYes/yes
AIRBAGSDual front, front side, f/r curtainDual front, front side, f/r curtainDual front, front side, f/r curtain
BASIC WARRANTY4 yrs/50,000 miles4 yrs/50,000 miles4 yrs/50,000 miles
POWERTRAIN WARRANTY4 yrs/50,000 miles4 yrs/50,000 miles5 yrs/100,000 miles
ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE4 yrs/unlimited4 yrs/unlimited5 yrs/100,000 miles
FUEL CAPACITY16.9 gal16.6 gal18.0 gal
EPA CITY/HWY ECON15/22 mpg14/20 mpg12/18 mpg
CO2 EMISSIONS1.11 lb/mile1.20 lb/mile1.37 lb/mile
MT OBS FUEL ECONOMY13.3 mpg13.9 mpg11.8 mpg
RECOMMENDED FUELUnleaded premiumUnleaded premiumUnleaded premium
* SAE CERTIFIED




Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/1009_2010_audi_rs_5_vs_2011_bmw_m3_vs_2011_cadillac_cts_v_comparison/specs.html#ixzz0xXTUPdo0




作者: 夜螺丝    时间: 2010-8-25 10:23:40

CTS的外形不错....
性能数据不是重点....
有没有回头率数据
作者: baikal    时间: 2010-8-25 11:27:46

M3对应 RS5啊,有RS4吗?
作者: leo19840119    时间: 2010-8-25 11:55:50

提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者: Tian.Tian    时间: 2010-8-25 11:56:18

RS5和M3比CTSV贵不少呢吧!再说个人觉得咱们是没有机会去100%发挥爱车的性能的。
作者: houhao    时间: 2010-8-25 13:10:08

提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者: dude999    时间: 2010-8-25 16:38:08

THINK M3 HANDLES THE BEST OF THE THREE
作者: 扮猪吃老虎    时间: 2010-8-25 23:11:02

还是喜欢C63,M3不咋地!
作者: andy3009    时间: 2010-8-25 23:21:39

CTS-V 好车啊
作者: wkwk123    时间: 2010-8-25 23:27:04

依然情迷M3!!!!!!!!!!!!
作者: Lonelygirl    时间: 2010-9-16 20:56:24

{:5_281:} my new car come in,rs5~~~~~~~~~!
作者: ERICGU    时间: 2010-9-16 22:18:32

我也觉得 C63 AMG 比较帅点
作者: A.J    时间: 2010-9-16 23:17:37

M3,始终称王啊~~~综合还是第一
作者: Baby_Vicky    时间: 2010-9-16 23:59:36

提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者: flyinbed    时间: 2010-9-17 02:11:31

外形还是C63大气.....CTS-V也不错,而且价钱...




欢迎光临 新西兰天维网社区 (http://bbs.skykiwi.com/) Powered by Discuz! X2