原帖由 policemen 于 2009-7-27 12:30 发表
you can write letter to PIB to ask for notes made by the constable..
if the constable got good notes about your driving manner and following distant..and speed.....give up...
if dont have good d ...
原帖由 JR01 于 27/7/2009 15:41 发表
thank you very much for your info. the constable said to me that I was changing lane without keeping a distance of 37-50metres according to the speed, $150 for it. also did not indicate. I said to ...
原帖由 policemen 于 2009-7-28 08:04 发表
37-50m....i believe you were on highway, 80km zone...
and yes, i know, in auckland such space doesnt just happen...there will be someone cutting in....
80% of driver broke the traffic law by doi ...
原帖由 policemen 于 2009-7-28 08:04 发表
37-50m....i believe you were on highway, 80km zone...
and yes, i know, in auckland such space doesnt just happen...there will be someone cutting in....
80% of driver broke the traffic law by doi ...
原帖由 policemen 于 2009-7-29 23:55 发表
yes, because more people die from crash than murder....
speed is 1st killer..
drink and drive is 2nd...
txting while driving 3rd...
原帖由 policemen 于 2009-7-29 23:55 发表
yes, because more people die from crash than murder....
speed is 1st killer..
drink and drive is 2nd...
txting while driving 3rd...
原帖由 JR01 于 2009-7-30 10:30 发表
I see people driving and taking on the phone everday! Do police should do something about it ? Or just because most of these people are mid-class of the society and politicions? Frankly I only saw ...
原帖由 烟酒不沾 于 2009-7-30 11:18 AM 发表
so i heard from news, police can only give 50 dollars fine for driving with phone call, bt hw my friend got sued to court of careless driving by a phone call while driving? most europeans and maori ...
原帖由 fatality 于 2009-7-30 12:16 发表
BEAR IN MIND:
YOU DO THAT AND GET CAUGHT, THATS NOT THE POLICES FAULT, IT'S YOURS.
SOME PEOPLE DO THAT AND GET AWAY FROM IT, THAT'S NOT THE REASON OF YOU DOING THE WRONG THING.
...
原帖由 fatality 于 2009-7-30 12:16 发表
BEAR IN MIND:
YOU DO THAT AND GET CAUGHT, THATS NOT THE POLICES FAULT, IT'S YOURS.
SOME PEOPLE DO THAT AND GET AWAY FROM IT, THAT'S NOT THE REASON OF YOU DOING THE WRONG THING.
...
原帖由 policemen 于 2009-7-29 23:55 发表
yes, because more people die from crash than murder....
speed is 1st killer..
drink and drive is 2nd...
txting while driving 3rd...
原帖由 kobeqiu 于 2009-8-1 19:15 发表
去年我在一号高速上超速,开了160,被警察拦下了,但他没有罚我,我说了我超速的原因,我说我早上5点上班,睡过头快迟到了所以开快车,不知道他有没有做记录。但从那次以后我再也不超速了,不是怕被警察抓,命是自己 ...
原帖由 policemen 于 2009-8-1 10:27 发表
給你一個真實例子
昨晚我攔一台車超速66km...限速50km..華人車主, 想爭辯要求證據
解釋了測速機如何作用後, 希望我給個警告, 我說不行開了一張65km的罰單80
生氣的走了, 看到這可能有人覺得我是走狗自己人都不放過 ...
原帖由 兲使Dè邪淰 于 10/8/2009 09:56 发表
好像限速50的路..有90%以上都开60以下包括60..
高速上限速100.有90%以上都会开到110左右.
这样会得到罚单么???想了解下.
原帖由 policemen 于 2009-8-10 19:56 发表
unspoken rule is 10km tolerance...because we aint machine..we cant drive at 50km always..
thats where the 10km tolerance come from...
so in most case, speed limit +10km is the limit...and +11k ...
原帖由 policemen 于 2009-8-11 18:19 发表
這個要看情況, 如果你有足夠的距離跟時間去閃躲或停下
但是你卻沒有這麼做 那只要有證人證明這一點車主一定是錯的
但是如果有證人可以證明是行人忽然跑出來剎車不及撞上 那錯是行人的
很多時候是車主看到 ...
原帖由 一只熊 于 2009-8-1 10:01 PM 发表
Speeding 1st
DUI 2nd - influence includes alcohol, drug and being given BJ lolllllll
欢迎光临 新西兰天维网社区 (http://bbs.skykiwi.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X2 |